“Paul Dumas, physician, deposes that he was called to view the bodies about day-break.  They were both then lying on the sacking of the bedstead in the chamber where Mademoiselle L. was found.  The corpse of the young lady was much bruised and excoriated.  The fact that it had been thrust up the chimney would sufficiently account for these appearances.  The throat was greatly chafed.  There were several deep scratches just below the chin, together with a series of livid spots which were evidently the impression of fingers.  The face was fearfully discolored, and the eye-balls protruded.  The tongue had been partially bitten through.  A large bruise was discovered upon the pit of the stomach, produced, apparently, by the pressure of a knee.  In the opinion of M. Dumas, Mademoiselle L’Espanaye had been throttled to death by some person or persons unknown.  The corpse of the mother was horribly mutilated.  All the bones of the right leg and arm were more or less shattered.  The left tibia much splintered, as well as all the ribs of the left side.  Whole body dreadfully bruised and discolored.  It was not possible to say how the injuries had been inflicted.  A heavy club of wood, or a broad bar of iron — a chair — any large, heavy, and obtuse weapon would have produced such results, if wielded by the hands of a very powerful man.  No woman could have inflicted the blows with any weapon.  The head of the deceased, when seen by witness, was entirely separated from the body, and was also greatly shattered.  The throat had evidently been cut with some very sharp instrument — probably with a razor.

“Alexandre Etienne, surgeon, was called with M. Dumas to view the bodies.  Corroborated the testimony, and the opinions of M. Dumas.

“Nothing farther of importance was elicited, although several other persons were examined.  A murder so mysterious, and so perplexing in all its particulars, was never before committed in Paris — if indeed a murder has been committed at all.  The police are entirely at fault - an unusual occurrence in affairs of this nature.  There is not, however, the shadow of a clew apparent.”

The evening edition of the paper stated that the greatest excitement still continued in the Quartier St. Roch — that the premises in question had been carefully re-searched, and fresh examinations of witnesses instituted, but all to no purpose.  A postscript, however, mentioned that Adolphe Le Bon had been arrested and imprisoned — although nothing appeared to criminate him, beyond the facts already detailed.

Dupin seemed singularly interested in the progress of this affair —­ at least so I judged from his manner, for he made no comments.  It was only after the announcement that Le Bon had been imprisoned, that he asked me my opinion respecting the murders.

I could merely agree with all Paris in considering them an insoluble mystery.  I saw no means by which it would be possible to trace the murderer.