I know he is apt to be sanguine in his Opinions of
Men, & his Zeal in Elections has been commendable.
But as I did not interest myself at all in the late
Elections he might have spared me. I have candidly
declared, when I was asked in Boston, who I thought
to be most endowd with those great Qualities, which
should characterize the first Magistrate of so respectable
a Commonwealth. This is the Right, it is the Duty
of every Citizen. And had I been present, I should
most certainly have voted for that Candidate.
I may have been mistaken in my Judgment; and, as it
becomes a Citizen, I will, acquiesce in the Choice
of a Majority of the People, who ought to know & prefer
the fittest Person. If they do not, they are
hardly worthy to be servd by any Man. I hope we
shall never fall into those Dregs of Time, when it
shall be the Custom for one Citizen to treat another
ill, merely because a popular Man has markd him as
his Enemy, or because others, for servile Purposes,
have reported him as such. This may afford Sport
for the Enemies of our Cause, who are laying the Snare
with great Art & Industry. James Rivington has
publishd in his Royal Gazette, that the Acrimony between
Mr Hancock & me, was owing to his Attachment to General
Washington, & my being on the Contrary, desirous of
his Removal. This is an old Story which Men have
believd and disbelievd as they pleasd, without much
Concern of mine. It was a pityful Contrivance
to render me obnoxious to the General & our common
Friends. If there has been any Difference between
Mr H and me, Rivington knows not the Origin of it.
Mr Hancock never thought me an Enemy to Gen1 Washington.
He never thought that I was desirous of his being
removd, & therefore could never treat me with Acrimony
on that Account. I never wishd for the Removal
of General Washington, but if I had even attempted
to effect it, it might have been an Evidence of my
Deficiency in Judgment, or Rashness, but it could
be no Evidence that I was his Enemy. Mr W C may
think that I am an Enemy to Mr Hancock, because he
may have heard that I preferd another as a Governor
before him. At this Rate, I must be thought an
Enemy to every Man to whom I cannot give the Preference
for an exalted Station for which few of the Many can
be supposd to be qualified. Ridiculous [&] mischievous
as this is, I am told that some carry their opinions
further and that it is not enough, that a Man who cannot
consistently vote for a Governor is to be reckon’d
his Enemy, but he is for this Reason to be excluded
from every Department. Who could wish to hold
a Seat in Government on so slavish a Tenure? The
People of Massachusetts under the old Government have
seen enough of the mischievous Effects of the Governors
having a Power to negative Elections & I cannot see
the Difference between this & his being able to influence
or prevent an Election by causing it to be believd
that a Candidate is his Enemy. He who gives his
Suffrage according to the Dictates of a well informd