of Tzarogy, at the Court of the Margrave of Anspach.  Then he went, they say, to Italy, and then north to the Landgrave Charles of Hesse, who dabbled in alchemy.  Here he is said to have died about 1780-85, leaving his papers to the Landgrave but all is very vague after he disappeared from Paris in 1760.  When next I meet Saint-Germain he is again at Paris, again mysteriously rich, again he rather disappears than dies, he calls himself Major Fraser, and the date is in the last years of Louis Philippe.  My authority may be caviled at; it is that of the late ingenious Mr. Van Damme, who describes Major Fraser in a book on the characters of the Second Empire.  He does not seem to have heard of Saint-Germain, whom he does not mention.

Major Fraser, “in spite of his English (sic) name, was decidedly not English, though he spoke the language.”  He was (like Saint-Germain) “one of the best dressed men of the period. . . .  He lived alone, and never alluded to his parentage.  He was always flush of money, though the sources of his income were a mystery to everyone.”  The French police vainly sought to detect the origin of Saint-Germain’s supplies, opening his letters at the post-office.  Major Fraser’s knowledge of every civilized country at every period was marvelous, though he had very few books.  “His memory was something prodigious. . . .  Strange to say, he used often to hint that his was no mere book knowledge. “’Of course, it is perfectly ridiculous,’” he remarked, with a strange smile, “’but every now and then I feel as if this did not come to me from reading, but from personal experience.  At times I become almost convinced that I lived with Nero, that I knew Dante personally, and so forth.’"[1] At the major’s death not a letter was found giving a clew to his antecedents, and no money was discovered.  Did he die?  As in the case of Saint-Germain, no date is given.  The author had an idea that the major was “an illegitimate son of some exalted person” of the period of Charles IV. and Ferdinand VII. of Spain.

[1] An Englishman in Paris, vol. i., pp. 130-133.  London, 1892.

The author does not mention Saint-Germain, and may never have heard of him.  If his account of Major Fraser is not mere romance, in that warrior we have the undying friend of Louis XV. and Madame de Pompadour.  He had drunk at Medmenham with Jack Wilkes; as Riccio he had sung duets with the fairest of unhappy queens; he had extracted from Blanche de Bechamel the secret of Goby de Mouchy.  As Pinto, he told much of his secret history to Mr. Thackeray, who says:  “I am rather sorry to lose him after three little bits of Roundabout Papers.”

Did Saint-Germain really die in a palace of Prince Charles of Hesse about 1780-85?  Did he, on the other hand, escape from the French prison where Grosley thought he saw him, during the French Revolution?  Was he known to Lord Lytton about 1860?  Was he then Major Fraser?  Is he the mysterious Muscovite adviser of the Dalai Lama?  Who knows?  He is a will-o’-the-wisp of the memoir-writers of the eighteenth century.  Whenever you think you have a chance of finding him in good authentic State papers, he gives you the slip; and if his existence were not vouched for by Horace Walpole, I should incline to deem him as Betsy Prig thought of Mrs. Harris.