Now this brother had always been called by his second name and not by the name of James.  My father said, “If you are my brother, give me your full name.”  The medium replied, “James Ash-a-bell Abbott,” giving an entirely wrong pronunciation of the second name.  This it was, with some other error, that led to the discussion they had on returning to the parlor, and in which my father remarked, “If you get your information from the dead, they should be able to pronounce their own names correctly.”

My father, not being familiar with the methods of trickery, could not with exactness give all the minute details of the test as I would have wished; and as I never had an opportunity to see this experiment myself, I can only surmise the means employed in its production.

The second experiment with my father had been an effort to tell the disease of which my grandfather died, also the place where he died.  The medium required my father to write on the usual ruled paper, a name of a disease and also a name of a place, in each space, that is, one disease and one place in each space.  He remarked in giving directions, “Like New York measles, Philadelphia smallpox, etc.”  He required, however, that my father write in the same space the correct disease, and also the correct place of his father’s death.  The remainder of the spaces were to contain the names of any disease or any place he might choose.

This my father did, writing in one space “Sacramento dysentery.”  This was the correct disease, but the city was the place of my grandfather’s burial, and not the place of his death, the latter being a village called “Hangtown.”  The medium quickly gave dysentery as the disease, and Sacramento as the place of my grandfather’s death.  It was plain that had my father written the village where his father died, instead of his burial place, the medium would have succeeded.

This, however, proved beyond a doubt that the medium obtained his information from the writing, and not from the spirits of the dead.

. . . . .

After thinking the matter over, I decided that, while I was uncertain as to the manner in which Dr. Schlossenger had performed all of these experiments, I could reproduce two of them with certainty as often as he did.  I immediately made the trial and found I could succeed fully nine times out of ten on an average.  I might state that the doctor also failed about one time in ten on an average; nevertheless, the people of the community were greatly excited, talking of his miracles, in groups on the streets, for some days.  The medium was coining money, yet I found a few cases where he failed totally.  The failures were seldom mentioned; it was the successes that excited the people.

The method I use in reproducing the first test given me, is to so direct the attention of the subjects before the writing, by my discourse, as to cause them to select unconsciously the name of the dead person in advance.  This is easily managed with a little practice in talking, and still they will never guess that it is done on purpose.