After eight days’ voyage on the Indian Ocean
we shall be in Bombay. I must close now, for
there is really nothing to say, and, besides, I am
wanted on deck. My engagement is with a Rev.
Mr. Barrows, who is bound as missionary to Hong Kong.
This worthy Methodist gentleman is very much exercised
because I insist that potentiality is necessity and
rebut his arguments on free-will. He got quite
excited yesterday, and said to me severely: “Do
you mean to say, young man, that I can’t do
as I please?” I must say I don’t think
his warmth was much allayed by my replying: “I
certainly mean to say you can’t please as you
please. You may eat sugar because you prefer
it to vinegar, but you can’t prefer it just because
you will to do so.” He has probably got
some new arguments now and is anxious to try their
effect, so, with kind regards to Miss Darrow —I
trust she is well—I remain,
Cordially
your friend,
George
Maitland.
P. S. (Like a woman I always write a postscript.) You shall hear again from me as soon as I reach Bombay.
This last promise was religiously kept, though his letter was short and merely announced his safe arrival early that morning. He closed by saying: “I have not yet breakfasted, preferring to do so on land, and I feel that I can do justice to whatever is set before me. I intend, as soon as I have taken the edge off my appetite, to set out immediately for Malabar Hill, as I believe that to be our proper starting-point. I inclose a little sketch I made of Bombay as we came up its harbour, thinking it may interest Miss Darrow. Kindly give it to her with my regards. You will note that there are two tongues of land in the picture. On the eastern side is the suburb of Calaba, and on the western our Malabar Hill. Good-bye until I have something of interest to report.”
I gave the sketch to Gwen, and she seemed greatly pleased with it.
“Are you aware,” she said to me, “that Mr. Maitland draws with rare precision?”
“I am fully persuaded,” I rejoined, “that he does not do anything which he cannot do well.”
“I believe there is nothing,” she continued, “which so conduces to the habit of thoroughness as the experiments of chemistry. When one learns that even a grain of dust will, in some cases, vitiate everything, he acquires a new conception of the term ‘clean’ and is likely to be thorough in washing his apparatus. From this the habit grows upon him and widens its application until it embraces all his actions.”