which denotes their political creed—­viz., that “the first principle of a community is the good of all.”  Aub is invention; Sila, a tone in music.  Glaubsila, as uniting the ideas of invention and of musical intonation, is the classical word for poetry—­abbreviated, in ordinary conversation, to Glaubs.  Na, which with them is, like Gl, but a single letter, always, when an initial, implies something antagonistic to life or joy or comfort, resembling in this the Aryan root Nak, expressive of perishing or destruction.  Nax is darkness; Narl, death; Naria, sin or evil.  Nas—­an uttermost condition of sin and evil—­corruption.  In writing, they deem it irreverent to express the Supreme Being by any special name.  He is symbolized by what may be termed the heiroglyphic of a pyramid, /\.  In prayer they address Him by a name which they deem too sacred to confide to a stranger, and I know it not.  In conversation they generally use a periphrastic epithet, such as the All-Good.  The letter V, symbolical of the inverted pyramid, where it is an initial, nearly always denotes excellence of power; as Vril, of which I have said so much; Veed, an immortal spirit; Veed-ya, immortality; Koom, pronounced like the Welsh Cwm, denotes something of hollowness.  Koom itself is a cave; Koom-in, a hole; Zi-koom, a valley; Koom-zi, vacancy or void; Bodh-koom, ignorance (literally, knowledge-void).  Koom-posh is their name for the government of the many, or the ascendancy of the most ignorant or hollow.  Posh is an almost untranslatable idiom, implying, as the reader will see later, contempt.  The closest rendering I can give to it is our slang term, “bosh;” and this Koom-Posh may be loosely rendered “Hollow-Bosh.”  But when Democracy or Koom-Posh degenerates from popular ignorance into that popular passion or ferocity which precedes its decease, as (to cite illustrations from the upper world) during the French Reign of Terror, or for the fifty years of the Roman Republic preceding the ascendancy of Augustus, their name for that state of things is Glek-Nas.  Ek is strife—­Glek, the universal strife.  Nas, as I before said, is corruption or rot; thus, Glek-Nas may be construed, “the universal strife-rot.”  Their compounds are very expressive; thus, Bodh being knowledge, and Too a participle that implies the action of cautiously approaching,—­Too-bodh is their word for Philosophy; Pah is a contemptuous exclamation analogous to our idiom, “stuff and nonsense;” Pah-bodh (literally stuff and nonsense-knowledge) is their term for futile and false philosophy, and applied to a species of metaphysical or speculative ratiocination formerly in vogue, which consisted in making inquiries that could not be answered, and were not worth making; such, for instance, as “Why does an An have five toes to his feet instead of four or six?  Did the first An, created by the All-Good, have the same number of toes as his descendants?  In the form by which an An will be recognised by his friends in the future state of being, will he retain any toes at all, and, if so, will they be material toes or spiritual toes?” I take these illustrations of Pahbodh, not in irony or jest, but because the very inquiries I name formed the subject of controversy by the latest cultivators of that ’science,’—­4000 years ago.