is freed from all paternal control. The father,
while he expects to be obeyed, continues to fill the
paternal office of paymaster—of paymaster,
at any rate, to some extent. And so, I think,
it must be with our colonies. The Canadas at
present are not independent, and have not political
power of their own apart from the political power
of Great Britain. England has declared herself
neutral as regards the Northern and Southern States,
and by that neutrality the Canadas are bound; and yet
the Canadas were not consulted in the matter.
Should England go to war with France, Canada must
close her ports against French vessels. If England
chooses to send her troops to Canadian barracks, Canada
cannot refuse to accept them. If England should
send to Canada an unpopular governor, Canada has no
power to reject his services. As long as Canada
is a colony so called, she cannot be independent,
and should not be expected to walk alone. It
is exactly the same with the colonies of Australia,
with New Zealand, with the Cape of Good Hope, and
with Jamaica. While England enjoys the prestige
of her colonies, while she boasts that such large
and now populous territories are her dependencies,
she must and should be content to pay some portion
of the bill. Surely it is absurd on our part
to quarrel with Caffre warfare, with New Zealand fighting,
and the rest of it. Such complaints remind one
of an ancient pater familias who insists on having
his children and his grandchildren under the old paternal
roof, and then grumbles because the butcher’s
bill is high. Those who will keep large households
and bountiful tables should not be afraid of facing
the butcher’s bill or unhappy at the tonnage
of the coal. It is a grand thing, that power
of keeping a large table; but it ceases to be grand
when the items heaped upon it cause inward groans
and outward moodiness.
Why should the colonies remain true to us as children
are true to their parents, if we grudge them the assistance
which is due to a child? They raise their own
taxes, it is said, and administer them. True;
and it is well that the growing son should do something
for himself. While the father does all for him,
the son’s labor belongs to the father.
Then comes a middle state in which the son does much
for himself, but not all. In that middle state
now stand our prosperous colonies. Then comes
the time when the son shall stand alone by his own
strength; and to that period of manly, self-respected
strength let us all hope that those colonies are advancing.
It is very hard for a mother country to know when
such a time has come; and hard also for the child-colony
to recognize justly the period of its own maturity.
Whether or no such severance may ever take place
without a quarrel, without weakness on one side and
pride on the other, is a problem in the world’s
history yet to be solved. The most successful
child that ever yet has gone off from a successful
parent, and taken its own path into the world, is