It is, I think, only necessary to look back to the Revolution by which the United States separated themselves from England to see this.  There is hardly to be met, here and there, an Englishman who now regrets the loss of the revolted American colonies; who now thinks that civilization was retarded and the world injured by that revolt; who now conceives that England should have expended more treasure and more lives in the hope of retaining those colonies.  It is agreed that the revolt was a good thing; that those who were then rebels became patriots by success, and that they deserved well of all coming ages of mankind.  But not the less absolutely necessary was it that England should endeavor to hold her own.  She was as the mother bird when the young bird will fly alone.  She suffered those pangs which Nature calls upon mothers to endure.

As was the necessity of British opposition to American independence, so was the necessity of Northern opposition to Southern secession.  I do not say that in other respects the two cases were parallel.  The States separated from us because they would not endure taxation without representation—­in other words, because they were old enough and big enough to go alone.  The South is seceding from the North because the two are not homogeneous.  They have different instincts, different appetites, different morals, and a different culture.  It is well for one man to say that slavery has caused the separation, and for another to say that slavery has not caused it.  Each in so saying speaks the truth.  Slavery has caused it, seeing that slavery is the great point on which the two have agreed to differ.  But slavery has not caused it, seeing that other points of difference are to be found in every circumstance and feature of the two people.  The North and the South must ever be dissimilar.  In the North labor will always be honorable, and because honorable, successful.  In the South labor has ever been servile—­at least in some sense—­and therefore dishonorable; and because dishonorable, has not, to itself, been successful.  In the South, I say, labor ever has been dishonorable; and I am driven to confess that I have not hitherto seen a sign of any change in the Creator’s fiat on this matter.  That labor will be honorable all the world over as years advance and the millennium draws nigh, I for one never doubt.

So much for English opinion about America in August last.  And now I will venture to say a word or two as to American feeling respecting this English opinion at that period.  It will of course be remembered by all my readers that, at the beginning of the war, Lord Russell, who was then in the lower house, declared, as Foreign Secretary of State, that England would regard the North and South as belligerents, and would remain neutral as to both of them.  This declaration gave violent offense to the North, and has been taken as indicating British sympathy with the cause of the seceders.  I am not going