discussion, and one which I am not prepared to hold.
It may be that a dependent country, let the feeling
of dependence be ever so much modified by powers of
self-governance, cannot hold its own against countries
which are in all respects their own masters.
Few, I believe, would now maintain that the Northern
States of America would have risen in commerce as
they have risen, had they still remained attached
to England as colonies. If this be so, that
privilege of self-rule which they have acquired has
been the cause of their success. It does not
follow as a consequence that the Canadas, fighting
their battle alone in the world, could do as the States
have done. Climate, or size, or geographical
position might stand in their way. But I fear
that it does follow, if not as a logical conclusion,
at least as a natural result, that they never will
do so well unless some day they shall so fight their
battle. It may be argued that Canada has in fact
the power of self-governance; that she rules herself
and makes her own laws as England does; that the Sovereign
of England has but a veto on those laws, and stands
in regard to Canada exactly as she does in regard
to England. This is so, I believe, by the letter
of the Constitution, but is not so in reality, and
cannot in truth be so in any colony even of Great
Britain. In England the political power of the
Crown is nothing. The Crown has no such power,
and now-a-days makes no attempt at having any.
But the political power of the Crown as it is felt
in Canada is everything. The Crown has no such
power in England, because it must change its ministers
whenever called upon to do so by the House of Commons.
But the Colonial Minister in Downing Street is the
Crown’s Prime Minister as regards the colonies,
and he is changed not as any colonial House of Assembly
may wish, but in accordance with the will of the British
Commons. Both the houses in Canada—that,
namely, of the Representatives, or Lower Houses and
of the Legislative Council, or Upper House—are
now elective, and are filled without direct influence
from the Crown. The power of self-government
is as thoroughly developed as perhaps may be possible
in a colony. But, after all, it is a dependent
form of government, and as such may perhaps not conduce
to so thorough a development of the resources of the
country as might be achieve under a ruling power of
its own, to which the welfare of Canada itself would
be the chief if not the only object.
I beg that it may not be considered from this that
I would propose to Canada to set up for itself at
once and declare itself independent. In the
first place I do not wish to throw over Canada; and
in the next place I do not wish to throw over England.
If such a separation shall ever take place, I trust
that it may be caused, not by Canadian violence, but
by British generosity. Such a separation, however,
never can be good till Canada herself shall wish it.
That she does not wish it yet, is certain. If
Canada ever should wish it, and should ever press
for the accomplishment of such a wish, she must do
so in connection with Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.
If at any future time there be formed such a separate
political power, it must include the whole of British
North America.