(5) It must not be put in vague language.

(6) It must not be in a negative form, if a positive form be obtainable.  We must not be content to say that a lion is ‘no vegetarian,’ or ’no lover of daylight.’  To define a curve as a line ’always changing its direction’ may be better than as ‘in no part straight.’

Sec. 5.  The process of determining a Definition is inseparable from classification.  We saw that classification consists in distributing things into groups according to their likenesses and differences, regarding as a class those individuals which have most qualities in common.  In doing so we must, of course, recognise the common qualities or points of likeness; and to enumerate these is to define the name of the class.  If we discover the qualities upon which a class is based by direct observation and induction, by the same method we discover the definition of its name.

We saw also that classification is not merely the determination of isolated groups of things, but a systematic arrangement of such groups in relation to one another.  Hence, again, Definitions are not independent, but relative to one another; and, of course, in the same way as classes are relative.  That is to say, as a class is placed in subordination to higher or more comprehensive groups, so the definition of its name is subordinate to that of their names; and as a class stands in contrast with co-ordinate classes (those that are in the same degree of subordination to the same higher groups), so the definition of its name is in contrast or co-ordination with the definitions of their names.  Lion is subordinate to Felis, to Digitigrade, to Carnivore and so on up to Animal; and, beyond the Animal Kingdom, to Phenomenon; it is co-ordinate with tiger, puma, etc.; and more remotely it is co-ordinate with dog, jackal, wolf, which come under Canis—­a genus co-ordinate with Felis.  The definition of lion, therefore, is subordinate to that of Felis, and to all above it up to Phenomenon; and is co-ordinate with that of tiger, and with all species in the same grade.  This is the ground of the old method of definition per genus et differentiam.

The genus being the next class above any species, the differentia or Difference consists of the qualities which mark that species in addition to those that mark the genus, and which therefore distinguish it from all other species of the same genus.  In the above definition of lion, for example, all the properties down to “light and muscular in build” are generic, that is, are possessed by the whole genus, Felis; and the remaining four (size, colour, tufted tail, and mane in the male) are the Difference or specific properties, because in those points the lion contrasts with the other species of that genus.  Differences may be exhibited thus: