Charity is not alone to prescribe this office of piety.  A stronger law than charity has a claim in the matter, and that is the law of justice.  Justice demands a “quid pro quo,” it exacts a just compensation for services rendered.  Even though there be no agreement between parents and offspring, and the former gave without a thought of return, nature records a contract, by the terms of which parents in want are entitled to the same support from their children as the latter received from them in the days of their helplessness.

Those who do not live up to the terms of this natural contract stand amenable to the justice of Heaven.  The obligation follows them during life, wherever they go; and they can no more shirk it than they can efface the characters that declare it, graven on their hearts.  Nothing but sheer impossibility can dispense them.

So sacred and inviolable is this obligation that it passes before that of assisting wife and children, the necessity being equal; for filial obligations enjoy the distinction of priority.  Not even engagements contracted before God hold against the duty of relieving parental distress and want, for vows are of counsel and must yield to the dictates of natural and divine law.

Of course, the gravity of this obligation is proportionate to the stress of necessity under which parents labor.  To constitute a mortal sin of neglect, it is not necessary that a parent be in the extreme of privation and beggary.  It is not easy to draw the line between slight and grievous offending in this matter, but if some young men and women examined their conscience as carefully as they do their new spring suits and hats, they would find material for confession the avowal of which might be necessary to confessional integrity.

It has become the fashion with certain of the rising generation, after draining the family exchequer for some sixteen or eighteen years, to emancipate themselves as soon as their wages cover the cost of living, with a little surplus.  They pay their board, that is to say, they stand towards their parents as a stranger would, and forgetting the debt their younger years have piled up against them, they hand over a miserable pittance just enough to cover the expenses of bed and board.  This might, and possibly does, make them “feel big,” but that feeling is a false one, and the “bigness” experienced is certainly not in their moral worth, in many cases such conduct is a prevarication against the law of God.  This applies with equal force to young women whose vanity overrides the claims of charity and justice, and who are said to “put all their earnings on their backs,” while they eat the bread that another earns.

Frequently children leave home and leave all their obligations to their parents behind them at home.  If their letters are rare, enclosed checks are still rarer.  They like to keep the old folks informed of the fact that it costs a good deal to live away from home.  They sometimes come home on a visit; but these are visits; and visitors, even if they do stay quite a while, do not pay board.