But pity is a form of love; and just as we may never despise a fallen parent, just so do we owe him or her, even in the depths of his or her degradation, a meed of pity and commiseration.  There is no erring soul but may be reclaimed; every soul is worth the price of its redemption, and there is no unfortunate, be he ever so low, but deserves, for the sake of his soul, a tribute of sympathy and a prayer for his betterment.  And the child that refuses this, however just the cause of his aversion, offends against the law of nature, of charity and of God.

CHAPTER LVIII.  AUTHORITY AND OBEDIENCE.

Authority means the right to command; to command is to exact obedience, and obedience is submission of one’s will to that of another, will is a faculty that adores its own independence, is ambitious of rule and dominion, and can hardly bear to serve.  It is made free, and may not bend; it is proud, and hates to bend; some will add, it is the dominant faculty in man, and therefore should not bend.

Every man for himself; we are born free; all men are equal, and no one has the right to impose his will upon another; we are directly responsible to God, and “go-betweens” are repudiated by the common sense of mankind,—­this is good Protestant theory and it is most convenient and acceptable to the unregenerate heart of man.  We naturally like that kind of talk; it appeals to us instinctively.  It is a theory that possesses many merits besides that of being true in a sense in which only one takes it out of fifty who advocate it.

But these advocates are careful—­and the reason of their solicitude is anything but clear—­to keep within the religious lines, and they never dare to carry their theory into the domain of political society; their hard common sense forbids.  And they are likewise careful to prevent their children from practicing the doctrine within the realm of paternal authority, that is, if they have any children.  Society calls it anarchy, and parents call it “unnatural cussedness;” in religion it is “freedom of the children of God!”

If there is authority, there must be obedience; if one has the right to command, there arises in others the correlative duty and obligation to submit.  There is no question of how this will suit us; it simply does not, and will not, suit us; it is hard, painful and humiliating, but it is a fact, and that is sufficient.

Likewise, it is a fact that if authority was ever given by God to man, it was given to the parent; all men, Protestants and anarchists alike, admit this.  The social being and the religious being may reject and repudiate all law, but the child is subject to its parents, it must obey.  Failing in this, it sins.