conditions. Newly-gotten and ill-carried wealth
was in those days (Mr. Olmsted, of New York State,
assures us) as offensive in the more recently developed
and more prosperous parts of the South as in New York
City itself; and throughout the South sound instruction
and intellectual activity were markedly lacking—indeed,
there is no serious Southern literature by which we
can check these impressions of his. Comparing
the masses of moderately well-to-do and educated people
with whom he associated in the North and in the South,
he finds them both free from the peculiar vulgarity
which, we may be pained to know, he had discovered
among us in England; he finds honesty and dishonesty
in serious matters of conduct as prevalent in one
section as in the other; he finds the Northerner better
taught and more alert in mind; but he ascribes to him
an objectionable quality of “smartness,”
a determination to show you that he is a stirring
and pushing fellow, from which the Southerner is wholly
free; and he finds that the Southerner has derived
from home influences and from boarding schools in
which the influence of many similar homes is concentrated,
not indeed any great refinement, but a manner which
is “more true, more quiet, more modestly self-assured,
more dignified.” This advantage, we are
to understand, is diffused over a comparatively larger
class than in England. Beyond this he discerns
in a few parts of the South and notably in South Carolina
a somewhat inaccessible, select society, of which
the nucleus is formed by a few (incredibly few) old
Colonial families which have not gone under, and which
altogether is so small that some old gentlewomen can
enumerate all the members of it. Few as they
are, these form “unquestionably a wealthy and
remarkably generous, refined, and accomplished first
class, clinging with some pertinacity, although with
too evident an effort, to the traditional manners
and customs of an established gentry.”
No doubt the sense of high breeding, which was common
in the South, went beyond mere manners; it played
its part in making the struggle of the Southern population,
including the “mean whites,” in the Civil
War one of the most heroic, if one of the most mistaken,
in which a whole population has ever been engaged;
it went along with integrity and a high average of
governing capacity among public men; and it fitted
the gentry of the South to contribute, when they should
choose, an element of great value to the common life
of America. As it was, the South suffered to
the full the political degeneration which threatens
every powerful class which, with a distinct class
interest of its own, is secluded from real contact
with competing classes with other interests and other
ideas. It is not to be assumed that all individual
Southerners liked the policy which they learnt to
support in docile masses. But their very qualities
of loyalty made them the more ready, under accepted
and respected leaders, to adopt political aims and
methods which no man now recalls without regret.