right to men of less originality. If he was
never quite so great as all America took him to be,
it was not for want of brains or of honesty, but because
his consuming passion for the Union at all costs led
him into the path of least apparent risk to it.
Twice as Secretary of State (that is, chiefly, Foreign
Minister) he showed himself a statesman, but above
all he was an orator and one of those rare orators
who accomplish a definite task by their oratory.
In his style he carried on the tradition of English
Parliamentary speaking, and developed its vices yet
further; but the massive force of argument behind
gave him his real power. That power he devoted
to the education of the people in a feeling for the
nation and for its greatness. As an advocate
he had appeared in great cases in the Supreme Court.
John Marshall, the Chief Justice from 1801 to 1835,
brought a great legal mind of the higher type to the
settlement of doubtful points in the Constitution,
and his statesmanlike judgments did much both to strengthen
the United States Government and to gain public confidence
for it. It was a memorable work, for the power
of the Union Government, under its new Constitution,
lay in the grip of the Courts. The pleading of
the young Webster contributed much to this. Later
on Webster, and a school of followers, of whom perhaps
we may take “our Elijah Pogram” to have
been one, used ceremonial occasions, on which Englishmen
only suffer the speakers, for the purpose of inculcating
their patriotic doctrine, and Webster at least was
doing good. His greatest speech, upon an occasion
to which we shall shortly come, was itself an event.
Lincoln found in it as inspiring a political treatise
as many Englishmen have discovered in the speeches
and writings of Burke.
Henry Clay was a slighter but more attractive person.
He was apparently the first American public man whom
his countrymen styled “magnetic,” but
a sort of scheming instability caused him after one
or two trials to be set down as an “impossible”
candidate for the Presidency. As a dashing young
man from the West he had the chief hand in forcing
on the second war with Great Britain, from 1812 to
1814, which arose out of perhaps insufficient causes
and ended in no clear result, but which, it is probable,
marked a stage in the growth of loyalty to America.
As an older man he was famed as an “architect
of compromises,” for though he strove for emancipation
in his own State, Kentucky, and dreamed of a great
scheme for colonising the slaves in Africa, he was
supremely anxious to avert collision between North
and South, and in this respect was typical of his
generation. But about 1830 he was chiefly known
as the apostle of what was called the “American
policy.” This was a policy which aimed
at using the powers of the national Government for
the development of the boundless resources of the
country. Its methods comprised a national banking
system, the use of the money of the Union on great