Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index eBook

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 88 pages of information about Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index.

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index eBook

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 88 pages of information about Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index.

=Reading and travel.= See =Travel and reading.=

=Reason and imagination.= See =Imagination and reason.=

=Reasoning, Inductive.= See =Inductive reasoning.=

=Recall.=

The recall should be adopted in the United States as a measure of control by the people.  C. L. of P. Debates:  References.

The system of recall in use in Los Angeles, California, would be beneficial to the city of ——.  Wisconsin University, no. 262:  References.

=Recall of judges.=

All judges other than federal should be subject to the popular recall. 
Speaker, v. 7, p. 301:  Briefs and references.

The recall of judges is constitutional and will further the best interests of the people of the United States.  C. L. of P. Debates:  References.

=Reciprocity.=

The policy of concluding reciprocal commercial treaties with other nations is a wise one.  Ringwalt, p. 105:  Briefs and references.—­C.  L. of P. Reference lists.

=Reciprocity.= United States and Canada.

Commercial reciprocity between the United States and Canada is desirable.  Thomas, p. 178:  Briefs.

It would be advantageous to the United States to admit Canadian coal and lumber free of duty.  Speaker, v. 3, p. 95:  Briefs and references.—­C.  L. of P. Debates:  Briefs.

It would be to the advantage of the United States to establish complete commercial reciprocity between the United States and Canada.  Brookings, p. 102:  Briefs and references.

A reciprocal commercial treaty should be concluded between the United States and Canada.  Ringwalt, p. 113:  Briefs and references.

See also Retaliation.

=Reciprocity and free trade.=

Fair trade (reciprocity) v. free trade.  Askew, 1906, p. 90:  Briefs and references.

=Referendum.=

Askew, 1906, p. 192:  Briefs and references.—­Askew, 1911, p. 199: 
Briefs.

For and against the initiative and referendum for New York state. 
Speaker, v. 6, p. 431:  Speeches and references.

Initiative and referendum.  Debaters’ handbook ser., no. 11:  References and selected articles.

Initiative and referendum should be made a part of the legislative system of Ohio.  Pearson, p. 67:  Synopses of speeches, and references.

Initiative and referendum systems of enacting legislation should be adopted by Pennsylvania.  Speaker, v. 3, p. 281:  Briefs and references.—­C.  L. of P. Debates:  Briefs.

Is the adoption of the initiative and referendum practicable in this country?  Craig, p. 487:  Speeches.

Optional initiative and optional referendum should be adopted in state legislation.  Robbins, p. 121:  Briefs and references.

Should the referendum be introduced into English politics?  Gibson, p. 169:  Briefs and references.

The system of direct legislation by the people should be more generally adopted in the United States.  Wisconsin University, no. 224:  References.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.