Oh, but he reserved a superintendence over them.—­You shall hear what the superintendence was; you shall see, feel, smell, touch; it shall enter into every avenue and pore of your soul.  It will show you what was the real principle of Mr. Hastings’s government.  We will read to you what Sir John Shore says of that institution, and of the only ends and purposes which it could answer; your Lordships will then see how far he was justifiable in violating an act of Parliament, and giving out of the Council’s hands the great trust which the laws of his country had vested in them.  It is part of a paper written in 1785 by Mr. Shore, who was sole acting president of this committee to which all Bengal was delivered.  He was an old servant of the Company, and he is now at the head of the government of that country.  He was Mr. Hastings’s particular friend, and therefore you cannot doubt either of his being a competent evidence, or that he is a favorable evidence for Mr. Hastings, and that he would not say one word against the establishment of which he himself was at the head, that was not perfectly true, and forced out of him by the truth of the case.  There is not a single part of it that does not point out some abuse.

“In the actual collection of the revenues, nothing is more necessary than to give immediate attention to all complaints, which are preferred daily without number, and to dispatch them in a summary manner.  This cannot be done where the control is remote.  In every purgunnah throughout Bengal there are some distinct usages, which cannot be clearly known at a distance; yet in all complaints of oppression or extortion, these must be known before a decision can be pronounced.  But to learn at Calcutta the particular customs of a district of Rajeshahye or Dacca is almost impossible; and considering the channel through which an explanation must pass, and through which the complaint is made, any coloring may be given to it, and oppression and extortion, to the ruin of a district, may be practised with impunity.  This is a continual source of embarrassment to the Committee of Revenue in Calcutta.

“One object of their institution was to bring the revenues without the expenses of agency to the Presidency, and to remove all local control over the farmers, who were to pay their rents at Calcutta.  When complaints are made against farmers by the occupiers of the lands, it is almost impossible to discriminate truth from falsehood; but to prevent a failure in the revenue, it is found necessary, in all doubtful cases, to support the farmer,—­a circumstance which may give rise to and confirm the most cruel acts of oppression.  The real state of any district cannot be known by the Committee.  An occupier or zemindar may plead, that an inundation has ruined him, or that his country is a desert through want of rain.  An aumeen is sent to examine the complaint.  He returns with an exaggerated account of losses, proved in volumes of intricate