country to the Catholic faith by apostolic work.  Parish work is a part, an integral part, of Paulist work, but not its principal or chief work—­and parish work should be done so as to form a part of the main aim, the conversion of the non-Catholic people of the country.  In this manner we can labor to raise the standard of Catholic life here and throughout the world as a means of the general triumph of the Catholic faith.”

“I do not think that the principal characteristic of our Fathers and of our life should be poverty or obedience or any other special and secondary virtue, or even a cardinal virtue, but zeal for apostolic works.  Our vocation is apostolic—­conversion of souls to the faith, of sinners to repentance, giving missions, defence of the Christian religion by conferences, lectures, sermons, the pen, the press, and the like works; and in the interior, to propagate among men a higher and more spiritual life.  To supply the special element the age and each country demands, this is the peculiar work of religious communities:  this their field.  It is a fatal mistake when religious attempt to do the ordinary work of the Church.  Let religious practise prayer and study; there will always be enough of the work to which they are called.”

“Are the Paulists Religious?  Yes, and no.  Yes, of their age.  No, of the past; the words in neither case being taken in an exclusive meaning.”

“As regards the growth of the Paulist, he must develop in an apostolic vocation—­that is, in apostolic works, Catholic, universal; not in works which confine his life’s energies to a locality.  He must do the work of the Church.  The work of the Church, as Church, is to render her note of universality more and more conspicuous to render it sensible, palpable.  This is the spirit of the Church in our country.”

The following refers to the second trait of the character above given:  “A Paulist is to emphasize individuality; that is, to make individual liberty an essential element in every judgment that touches the life and welfare of the community and that of its members.  Those who emphasize the community element are inclined to look upon this as a dangerous and impracticable experiment.”

“Individuality is an integral and conspicuous element in the life of the Paulist. This must be felt.  One of the natural signs of the true Paulist is that he would prefer to suffer from the excesses of liberty rather than from the arbitrary actions of tyranny.”

“The individuality of a man cannot be too strong or his liberty too great when he is guided by the Spirit of God.  But when one is easily influenced from below rather than from above, it is an evidence of the spirit of pride and that of the flesh, and not ’the liberty of the glory of the children of God.’”

What follows touches the relation between the personal and common life: 

“Many other communities lay the main stress on community life as the chief element, giving it control as far as is consistent with fundamental individual right; the Paulists, on the contrary, give the element of individuality the first place and put it in control as far as is consistent with the common life.”