Third—­That they may also take into consideration, as bearing upon the same question, the fact that the inspectors considered the question and came to the conclusion that she had a right to vote.

Fourth—­That the jury have a right to find a general verdict of guilty or not guilty as they shall believe that she has or has not committed the offense described in the Statute.

A professional friend sitting by has made this suggestion which I take leave to avail myself of as bearing upon this question:  “The Court has listened for many hours to an argument in order to decide whether the defendant has a right to vote.  The arguments show the same question has engaged the best minds of the country as an open question.  Can it be possible that the defendant is to be convicted for acting upon such advice as she could obtain while the question is an open and undecided one?”

THE COURT:  You have made a much better argument than that, sir.

JUDGE SELDEN:  As long as it is an open question I submit that she has not been guilty of an offense.  At all events it is for the jury.

THE COURT:  I cannot charge these propositions of course.  The question, gentlemen of the jury, in the form it finally takes, is wholly a question or questions of law, and I have decided as a question of law, in the first place, that under the 14th Amendment, which Miss Anthony claims protects her, she was not protected in a right to vote.  And I have decided also that her belief and the advice which she took does not protect her in the act which she committed.  If I am right in this, the result must be a verdict on your part of guilty, and I therefore direct that you find a verdict of guilty.

JUDGE SELDEN:  That is a direction no Court has power to make in a criminal case.

THE COURT:  Take the verdict, Mr. Clerk.

THE CLERK:  Gentlemen of the jury, hearken to your verdict as the Court has recorded it.  You say you find the defendant guilty of the offense whereof she stands indicted, and so say you all?

JUDGE SELDEN:  I don’t know whether an exception is available, but I certainly must except to the refusal of the Court to submit those propositions, and especially to the direction of the Court that the jury should find a verdict of guilty.  I claim that it is a power that is not given to any Court in a criminal case.

Will the Clerk poll the jury?

THE COURT:  No.  Gentlemen of the jury, you are discharged.

On the next day a motion for a new trial was made by Judge Selden, as follows: 

May it please the Court: 

The trial of this case commenced with a question of very great magnitude—­whether by the constitution of the United States the right of suffrage was secured to female equally with male citizens.  It is likely to close with a question of much greater magnitude—­whether the right of trial by jury is absolutely secured by the federal constitution to persons charged with crime before the federal courts.