More’s of Cambridge.”  His biographer, Ward, concludes his life in the following glowing terms:—­“Thus lived and died the eminent Dr. More:  thus set this bright and illustrious star, vanishing by degrees out of our sight after, to the surprise and admiration of many, (like that which was observed in Cassiopeia’s chair,) it had illuminated, as it were, both worlds so long at once.”  At the lapse of many years I have not forgotten the impassioned fondness with which the late and most lamented Robert Southey dwelt upon the memory of the Cambridge Plato, or the delight with which he greeted some works of his favourite author which I was fortunate enough to point out to him, with which he had not been previously acquainted.  The sad reverse of the picture will he seen by those who consult the folio of More’s philosophical works and Glanville’s Sadducismus Triumphatus, the greatest part of which is derived from More’s Collections.  His hallucinations on the subject of witchcraft, from which none of the English writers of the Platonic school were exempt, are the more extraordinary, as a sister error, judicial astrology, met in More with its most able oppugner.  His tract, which has excited much less attention than its merit deserves, (I have not been able to trace a single quotation from it in any author during the last century,) is entitled “Tetractys Anti-astrologica, or a Confutation of Astrology.”  Lond. 1681, 4to.  I may mention while on the subject of More, that the second and most valuable part of the memoir of him by Ward, his devoted admirer and pupil, which was never printed, is in my possession, in manuscript.]

[Footnote 10:  See Boyle’s letter on the subject of the latter, in the 5th vol. of the folio edition of his works.]

[Footnote 11:  I have always considered the conclusion of Bodin’s book, De Republica, the accumulative grandeur of which is even heightened in Knolles’s admirable English translation, as the finest peroration to be found in any work on government.  Those who are fortunate enough to possess a copy of his interdicted Examination of Religions, the title of which is, “Colloquium heptaplomeres de abditis sublimium rerum arcanis, libris 6 digestum,” which was never printed, and of which very few MSS. copies are in existence, are well aware how little he felt himself shackled in the spirit of examination which he carried into the most sacred subjects by any respect for popular notions or received systems or great authorities.  My MS. copy of this extraordinary work, which came from Heber’s Collection, is contained in two rather thick folio volumes.]