King James, in his “Daemonology,” book ii., chap. 5, tells us, that “the Devil teacheth how to make pictures of wax or clay, that, by roasting thereof, the persons that they bear the name of may be continually melted or dried away by continual sickness.”

     See Servius on the 8th Eclogue of Virgil; Theocritus, Idyll,
     ii., 22; Hudibras, part II., canto ii., l. 351.

     Ovid says: 

     “Devovet absentes, simulachraque cerea figit
     Et miserum tenues in jecur urget acus.”
                    Heroid. Ep. vi., l. 91.

See also “Grafton’s Chronicle,” p. 587, where it is laid to the charge (among others) of Roger Bolinbrook, a cunning necromancer, and Margery Jordane, the cunning Witch of Eye, that they, at the request of Eleanor, Duchess of Gloucester, had devised an image of wax, representing the king, (Henry the Sixth,) which by their sorcery a little and a little consumed; intending thereby in conclusion to waste and destroy the king’s person.  Shakspeare mentions this, Henry VI., P. II., act i., sc. 4.

It appears, from Strype’s “Annals of the Reformation,”, vol. i., p. 8, under anno 1558, that Bishop Jewel, preaching before the queen, said, “It may please your grace to understand that witches and sorcerers within these few last years are marvellously increased within your grace’s realm.  Your grace’s subjects pine away, even unto the death; their colour fadeth, their flesh rotteth, their speech is benumbed, their senses are bereft.  I pray God they never practise further than upon the subject.”  “This,” Strype adds, “I make no doubt was the occasion of bringing in a bill, the next parliament, for making enchantments and witchcraft felony.”  One of the bishop’s strong expressions is, “These eyes have seen most evident and manifest marks of their wickedness.”

It appears from the same work, vol. iv., p. 6, sub anno 1589, that “one Mrs. Dier had practised conjuration against the queen, to work some mischief to her majesty; for which she was brought into question:  and accordingly her words and doings were sent to Popham, the queen’s attorney, and Egerton, her solicitor, by Walsingham, the secretary, and Sir Thomas Heneage, her vice-chamberlain, for their judgment, whose opinion was that Mrs. Dier was not within the compass of the statute touching witchcraft, for that she did no act, and spake certain lewd speeches tending to that purpose, but neither set figure nor made pictures.” Ibid., vol. ii., p. 545, sub anno 1578, Strype says:  “Whether it were the effect of magic, or proceeded from some natural cause, but the queen was in some part of this year under excessive anguish by pains of her teeth, insomuch that she took no rest for divers nights, and endured very great torment night and day.”

Andrews, in his “Continuation of Henry’s History of Great Britain,”