In the next year (B.C. 204) after recounting new prodigies
Livy continues:—“Then too the matter
of the Idaean Mother must be attended to, for aside
from the fact that Marcus Valerius, one of the ambassadors
who had been sent ahead, had announced that she would
soon be in Italy, there was also a fresh message that
she was already at Tarracina. The Senate had
to decide a very important matter, namely who was
the best man in the state, for every man in the state
preferred a victory in such a contest as this to any
commands or offices which the vote of the Senate or
the people might give him. They decided that of
all the good men in the state the best was Publius
Scipio.... He then with all the matrons was ordered
to go to Ostia to meet the goddess and to receive
her from the ship, to carry her to land and to give
her over to the women to carry. After the ship
came to the mouth of the Tiber, Scipio, going out
in a small boat, as he had been commanded, received
the goddess from the priests and carried her to land.
And the noblest women of the land ... received her
... and they carried the goddess in their arms, taking
turn about while all Rome poured out to meet her, and
incense-burners were placed before the doors where
she was carried by, and incense was burned in her
honour. And thus praying that she might enter
willingly and propitiously into the city, they carried
her into the temple of Victory, which is on the Palatine,
on the day before the Nones of April [April 4].
And this was a festal day and the people in great
numbers gave gifts to the goddess, and a banquet for
the gods was held, and games were performed which
were called
Megalesia.” This extraordinary
picture is probably in the main historically correct.
The most striking part of it, the enthusiasm of the
Roman populace, is certainly not overdrawn. Thus
was introduced into Rome the last deity ever summoned
by means of the books, the one whose cult was destined
to outlast that of all the others, and to do more
harm and produce more demoralisation than all the
other cults together. To understand why this
was so, we must go back for a moment.
The influence of Greece on Rome was progressive, and
we are able to indicate at least three distinct periods
and phases of it, so far as religion is concerned:
first, the informal coming of a few Greek gods who
adapted themselves more or less completely to the old
Roman character; such are Hercules and Castor and
even Apollo, though Apollo was indirectly responsible
for the second period, because he was the cause of
the coming of the Sibylline books. The influence
of these books produced the second period, with its
characteristics of ever-growing superstition, and
greater pomp in cult acts, but though the sobriety
of the old days had changed into a restless activity,
the new gods who came in and the new cult acts introduced
were still of such a character that Romans could take
part in the worship without shame. But just as
the staid Apollo had produced the books, so now as
their last bequest the books brought in the Great
Mother, and the third period had begun, the period
of orgiastic Oriental worship, which prevailed, at
least among certain classes, until the establishment
of Christianity. We may well ask who this Great
Mother was, and why this one Greek cult should be so
different from all the rest.