This, I repeat, is the impression produced on me by lengthy conversations with Count Tisza—­an impression which has been confirmed from other sources.  I am persuaded, however, that Tschirsky, in behaving as he did, widely overstretched his prescribed sphere of activity.  Iswolsky was not the only one of his kind.  I conclude this to be so, since Tschirsky, as intimated in a former dispatch, was never in a position to make an official declaration urging for war, but appears only to have spoken after the manner of diplomatic representatives when anxious to adapt the policy of their Government to their own point of view.  Undoubtedly Tschirsky transmitted his instructions correctly and loyally, nor did he keep back or secrete anything.  An ambassador attains more or less according to the energy expended by him in carrying out the instructions of his Government; and the private opinion of the ambassador is, under certain circumstances, not easy to distinguish from his official one.  At all events, the latter will be influenced by the former, and Tschirsky’s private opinion aimed at a more vigorous policy.

In complete ignorance of impending events, I had arrived at Steiermark a few days before the ultimatum in order to establish my family there for the summer.  While there I received a message from Berchtold to return to my post as quickly as possible.  I obeyed at once, but before leaving had one more audience with the Emperor Francis Joseph at Ischl.  I found the Emperor extremely depressed.  He alluded quite briefly to the coming events, and merely asked me if, in case of a war, I could guarantee Roumania’s neutrality.  I answered in the affirmative, so long as King Carol was alive; beyond that any guarantee was impossible.

3

Certain extremely important details relating to the period immediately preceding the outbreak of war can only be attributed to the influence of the group represented by Tschirsky.  It is incomprehensible why we granted to our then allies, Italy and Roumania, facilities for playing the part of seceders by presenting them with an ultimatum before action was completed, instead of winning them over and involving them also.

I am no accurate judge of the events in Rome, but King Carol in Roumania had certainly tried everything to induce Serbia to yield.  In all probability he would not have succeeded, as Serbia had no idea of renouncing her plans for a Greater Serbia; but presumably an anxious feeling would have arisen between Bucharest and Belgrade, which would strongly have influenced further Roumanian policy in our favour.

Bucharest has made enormous capital out of the diplomatic proceedings.

Before the first decisive Cabinet Council Baron Fasciotti, the Italian Ambassador, harangued all the members in this spirit, and declared that the situation in Roumania and Italy was similar, and in each case there was no reason for co-operation, as neither Rome nor Bucharest had previously come to an understanding regarding the ultimatum.  His efforts were crowned with success.