such an exhibition beneficial, it would not lament
over a few thousand eager witnesses: if the sermon
be edifying, you cannot have too large a congregation;
if you teach a moral lesson in a grand, impressive
way, it is difficult to see how you can have too many
pupils. Of course, neither the justice nor the
expediency of capital punishments falls to be discussed
here. This, however, may be said, that the popular
feeling against them may not be so admirable a proof
of enlightenment as many believe. It is true
that the spectacle is painful, horrible; but in pain
and horror there is often hidden a certain salutariness,
and the repulsion of which we are conscious is as
likely to arise from debilitation of public nerve,
as from a higher reach of public feeling. To
my own thinking, it is out of this pain and hatefulness
that an execution becomes invested with an ideal grandeur.
It is sheer horror to all concerned—sheriffs,
halbertmen, chaplain, spectators, Jack Ketch, and
culprit; but out of all this, and towering behind
the vulgar and hideous accessories of the scaffold,
gleams the majesty of implacable law. When every
other fine morning a dozen cut-purses were hanged
at Tyburn, and when such sights did not run very strongly
against the popular current, the spectacle was vulgar,
and could be of use only to the possible cut-purses
congregated around the foot of the scaffold.
Now, when the law has become so far merciful; when
the punishment of death is reserved for the murderer;
when he can be condemned only on the clearest evidence;
when, as the days draw slowly on to doom, the frightful
event impending over one stricken wretch throws its
shadow over the heart of every man, woman, and child
in the great city; and when the official persons whose
duty it is to see the letter of the law carried out
perform that duty at the expense of personal pain,—a
public execution is not vulgar, it becomes positively
sublime. It is dreadful, of course; but its dreadfulness
melts into pure awfulness. The attention is taken
off the criminal, and is lost in a sense of the grandeur
of justice; and the spectator who beholds an execution,
solely as it appears to the eye, without recognition
of the idea which towers behind it, must be a very
unspiritual and unimaginative spectator indeed.
It is taken for granted that the spectators of public executions—the artisans and country people who take up their stations overnight as close to the barriers as possible, and the wealthier classes who occupy hired windows and employ opera-glasses—are merely drawn together by a morbid relish for horrible sights. He is a bold man who will stand forward as the advocate of such persons—so completely is the popular mind made up as to their tastes and motives. It is not disputed that the large body of the mob, and of the occupants at windows, have been drawn together by an appetite for excitement; but it is quite possible that many come there from an impulse