hour by the Tron, hinny, and deil a ane has speered
our price.” Scott continued to practise
at the bar—nominally at least—for
fourteen years, but the most which he ever seems to
have made in any one year was short of 230_l._, and
latterly his practice was much diminishing instead
of increasing. His own impatience of solicitors’
patronage was against him; his well-known dabblings
in poetry were still more against him; and his general
repute for wild and unprofessional adventurousness—which
was much greater than he deserved—was probably
most of all against him. Before he had been six
years at the bar he joined the organization of the
Edinburgh Volunteer Cavalry, took a very active part
in the drill, and was made their Quartermaster.
Then he visited London, and became largely known for
his ballads, and his love of ballads. In his eighth
year at the bar he accepted a small permanent appointment,
with 300_l._ a year, as sheriff of Selkirkshire; and
this occurring soon after his marriage to a lady of
some means, no doubt diminished still further his
professional zeal. For one third of the time during
which Scott practised as an advocate he made no pretence
of taking interest in that part of his work, though
he was always deeply interested in the law itself.
In 1806 he undertook gratuitously the duties of a
Clerk of Session—a permanent officer of
the Court at Edinburgh—and discharged them
without remuneration for five years, from 1806 to
1811, in order to secure his ultimate succession to
the office in the place of an invalid, who for that
period received all the emoluments and did none of
the work. Nevertheless Scott’s legal abilities
were so well known, that it was certainly at one time
intended to offer him a Barony of the Exchequer, and
it was his own doing, apparently, that it was not
offered. The life of literature and the life of
the Bar hardly ever suit, and in Scott’s case
they suited the less, that he felt himself likely
to be a dictator in the one field, and only a postulant
in the other. Literature was a far greater gainer
by his choice, than Law could have been a loser.
For his capacity for the law he shared with thousands
of able men, his capacity for literature with few or
none.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 5: Lockhart’s Life of Scott, i. 269-71.]
[Footnote 6: Lockhart’s Life of Scott, i. 206.]
[Footnote 7: Lockhart’s Life of Scott, ix. 221.]
CHAPTER III.
LOVE AND MARRIAGE.