victims.  But all along the line, while the new gods brought their spiritual conceptions, the older ones held men to a cruder and more fleshly way of thinking.  There is a similar blend of new and old in all such movements as that of the Holy Grail and the Arthurian legends, where we can see the combination of Christian and pagan elements so clearly as to be able to calculate the moral and spiritual effect of each.  Thus we have in the early Greek mythology much of real paganism involved in the retention of the old and earth-bound gods which attached themselves to the nobler Olympians as they came, and dragged them down to the ancient level.

This blending may be seen very clearly in the mythology of Homer and Hesiod.  There it has been so thorough that the only trace of superposition which we can find is the succession of the dynasties of Chronos and Jupiter.  The result is the most appalling conception of the morality of celestial society.  No earthly state could hope to continue for a decade upon the principles which governed the life of heaven; and man, if he were to escape the sudden retributions which must inevitably follow anything like an imitation of his gods, must live more decently than they.

Now Homer was, in a sense, the Bible of the Greeks, and as society improved in morals, and thought was directed more and more fearlessly towards religious questions, the puzzle as to the immoralities of the gods became acute.  The religious and intellectual developments of the sixth century B.C. led to various ways of explaining the old stories.  Sophocles is conciliatory, conceiving religion in a sunny good temper which will make the best of the situation whatever it is.  AEschylus is sombre and deeply tragic, while yet he remains orthodox on the side of the gods.  But Euripides is angry at the old scandals, and in the name of humanity his scepticism rises in protest.

It may be interesting, at this point, to glance for a little at the various theories which have been brought forward to explain the myths.  The commonest of all such theories is that the divine personalities stand for the individual powers of nature.  Most especially, the gods and goddesses symbolise the sun, moon, and stars, night and morning, summer and winter, and the general story of the year.  No one will deny that the personification of Nature had a large share in all mythology.  The Oriental mythologies rose to a large extent in this fashion.  The Baals of Semitic worship all stood for one or other of the manifestations of the fructifying powers of nature, and the Chinese dragon is the symbol of the spiritual mystery of life suggested by the mysterious and protean characteristics of water.  It is very natural that this should be so, and every one who has ever felt the power of the sun in the East will sympathise with Turner’s dying words, “The sun, he is God.”