“We are accused of a desire to persecute.  It is calumny.  No persecution.  Fanaticism is greedy of it, real religion repulses it, philosophy holds it in horror.  Let us beware of imprisoning the nonjurors; of exiling, even of displacing them.  Let them think, say, write all they please against us.  We will oppose our thoughts to their thoughts; our truths to their errors; our charity to their hatred.  Time will do the rest.  But in awaiting its infallible triumph we must find an efficacious and prompt mode of hindering them from prevailing over weak minds, and propagating ideas of a counter-revolution.  A counter-revolution!  This is not a religion, gentlemen!  Fanaticism is not compatible with liberty.  Look else at these ministers—­they would have swum in the blood of patriots.  This is their own expression.  Compared with these priests, atheists are angels. (Applause.) However, I repeat, let us tolerate them, but do not let us pay them.  Let us not pay them to rend our country in pieces.  It is to this measure only that we should confine ourselves.  Let us suppress all salary from the national treasury to the nonjuring priests.  Nothing is due to them but in their clerical capacity.  What service do they render?  They invoke ruin on our laws; and they say they follow their consciences!  Must we pay consciences which push them to the extremity of crime against their country?  The nation supports them:  is not that enough?  They appeal to the article of the constitution, which says, ’The salaries of the ministers of Catholic worship form a portion of the national debt.’  Are they ministers of the Catholic worship?  Does the state recognise any other Catholicity than its own?  If they would attempt any other it is open to them and their sectarians!  The nation allows all sorts of worship, but only pays one.  And what a saving for the nation to be freed from thirty millions (of francs), which she pays annually to her most implacable enemies! (Bravo.) Why have we these phalanx of priests, who have abjured their ministry? these legions of canons and monks; these cohorts of abbes, friars, and beneficed clergy of all sorts, who were not remarkable otherwise, except for their pretensions, inutility, intrigues and licentious life; and are only so to-day by their vindictive interference, their schemes, their unwearied hatred of the Revolution?  Why should we pay this army of dependents from the funds of the nation?  What do they do?  They preach emigration, they send coin from the realm, they foment conspiracies against us from within and without.  Go, say they to the nobility, and combine your attacks with the foreigner; let blood flow in streams, provided that we recover our privileges!  This is their church!  If hell had one on earth it is thus that it would speak.  Who shall say we ought to endow it?”