Postscripts have been added to successive editions in reference to subsequent occurrences.

FOOTNOTES: 

[1] It was observed by some reviewer, that Hume himself, had he been alive, would doubtless have highly enjoyed the joke!  But even those who have the greatest delight in ridicule, do not relish jokes at their own expense.  Hume may have inwardly laughed, while mystifying his readers with arguments which he himself perceived to be futile.  But he did not mean the readers to perceive this.  And it is not likely that he would have been amused at seeing his own fallacies exposed and held up to derision.

[2] See Elements of Rhetoric, p. i. ch. 2, Sec. 4.

* * * * *

HISTORIC DOUBTS
RELATIVE TO
NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE.

Long as the public attention has been occupied by the extraordinary personage from whose ambition we are supposed to have so narrowly escaped, the subject seems to have lost scarcely anything of its interest.  We are still occupied in recounting the exploits, discussing the character, inquiring into the present situation, and even conjecturing as to the future prospects of Napoleon Buonaparte.

Nor is this at all to be wondered at, if we consider the very extraordinary nature of those exploits, and of that character; their greatness and extensive importance, as well as the unexampled strangeness of the events, and also that strong additional stimulant, the mysterious uncertainty that hangs over the character of the man.  If it be doubtful whether any history (exclusive of such as is confessedly fabulous) ever attributed to its hero such a series of wonderful achievements compressed into so small a space of time, it is certain that to no one were ever assigned so many dissimilar characters.

It is true, indeed, that party-prejudices have drawn a favourable and an unfavourable portrait of almost every eminent man; but amidst all the diversities of colouring, something of the same general outline is always distinguishable.  And even the virtues in the one description bear some resemblance to the vices of another:  rashness, for instance, will be called courage, or courage, rashness; heroic firmness, and obstinate pride, will correspond in the two opposite descriptions; and in some leading features both will agree.  Neither the friends nor the enemies of Philip of Macedon, or of Julius Caesar, ever questioned their COURAGE, or their MILITARY SKILL.

With Buonaparte, however, it has been otherwise.  This obscure Corsican adventurer, a man, according to some, of extraordinary talents and courage, according to others, of very moderate abilities, and a rank coward, advanced rapidly in the French army, obtained a high command, gained a series of important victories, and, elated by success, embarked in an expedition against Egypt; which was planned and conducted, according