P. ERCOLE.—­A review of M.A.  Micallela (La Fonte di Dione Cassio per le guerre galliche di Cesare). (Riv. di.  Fil. e d’Istr.  Class., 25th year, part 1.)

PH.  FABIA.—­The statement of Dio about Nero and Pappaea shown to be parallel with that of Tacitus (Hist.  I, 13). (Rev. de Phil., de Litt., et d’Hist. anciennes, Vol. 20, part 1.)

K. KUIPER.—­De Cassii Dionis Zonaraeque historiis epistula critica ad Ursulum Philippum Boissevain. (Mnemos., N.S.  Vol. 24.)

B. NIESE.—­Dio’s contributions to the history of the war against Pyrrhus. (Hermes, Vol. 31, part 4.)

F. VOGEL.—­Dio worthless for facts regarding Caesar’s second expedition into Britain. (N.  JB. f.  Ph. u.  Pae., 1896, books 3 and 4.)

——­ Dio LIII, 23, compared with inscription discovered at Philae, Egypt. (Philol., Vol. 55, part 1.)

1897.

D. DETLEFSEN.—­Dio LIV, 32, as a sample of ancient knowledge in regard to the North Sea. (Hermes, Vol. 32, part 2.)

PH.  FABIA.—­Ofonius rather than Sophonius (Dio MSS.) for the gentile name of Tigillinus. (Rev. de Phil., de Litt., et d’Hist. anciennes, Vol. 21, book 3.)

P. GAROFOLO.—­A citation of Dio. (Jhrb. of I. Mueller, 1897.)

B. KUEBLER.—­A review of Melber. (Dio, Vol. 2.—­Deutsche LZ., March 6.)

Id.—­A review of Boissevain. (Edition of Dio.—­B.P.W., May 15.)

——­ A mention of three articles by Melber.
     1.) Der Bericht des Dio Cassius ueber d. gall. 
         Kriege Caesars.

2.) Des Dio Cassius Bericht ueber d.  Seeschlacht
d.  D. Brutus geg. d.  Veneter.
3.) Dio Cassius ueber d. letzten Kaempfe geg. 
S. Pompejus, 36 v.  Chr. 
(Jhrb. of I. Mueller, 1897.)

——­ Mention of a rearrangement favored by Boissevain ("Ein verschobenes Fragment des Cassius Dio”) who holds that a certain fragment, old style LXXV, 9, 6, properly belongs to the year 116 A.D. and to Trajan’s expedition against the Parthians.

1898.

BUETTNER-WOBST.—­Dio corrected in regard to an episode in the siege of
Ambracia, 189 B.C. (Philol., Vol. 57, part 3.)

PH.  FABIA.—­An emendation and a change of order in Dio, LXI, 6, 6. 
(Rev. de Phil., de Litt., et d’Hist. anciennes, 1898, book 2.)

J. KROMAYER.—­Studies in the Second Triumvirate (Dio as a source). 
(Hermes, Vol. 33, part 1.)

B. KUEBLER.—­A review of Boissevain. (Dio, Vol. 2.—­B.P.W., Nov. 26 and Dec. 3.)

J. VAHLEN.—­Varia. (Dio LV, 6 and 7, for date of death of Maecenas). 
(Hermes, Vol. 33, part 2.)

1899.

WILH.  CROENERT.—–­A study of 34 pp. on the transmission of the text of
Dio. (Wiener Studien, 1899, book 1.)

K. JACOBY.—­A review of Boissevain. (Dio, Vol. 1.—­W.  Kl.  Ph., March 22.)

1900.

WILH.  CROENERT.—­Criticism of Boissevain. (Rev. Crit., July 2.)