[Illustration:  RUINS OF OLD POWDER MAGAZINE, FORT GEORGE]

CHAPTER VIII.

FRANCE, THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA.

Shortly after his return to Quebec, Isaac Brock succeeded to the command of the troops in both Upper and Lower Canada, with the pay and allowance of a brigadier.

Though no overt act had been committed against Canada by the United States, relations were strained, and he found much to occupy his time.  His humanity stirred, he set about erecting hospitals, reorganized the commissariat department, and engaged in an unpleasant dispute with President Dunn, the civil administrator of Lower Canada, regarding the fortifications of the Citadel.  To-day deep in plans for mobilizing the militia and the formation of a Scotch volunteer corps of Glengarry settlers; to-morrow devising the best way of utilizing an Indian force in the event of war.  In June, 1807, the affair between the British gunboat Leopard and the American frigate Chesapeake occurred.  The former boarded the latter in search of deserters, and on being challenged, gave the Chesapeake a broadside.  While the Leopard was clearly in the wrong, the United States Government rejected every offer of reparation made by Britain.  Then came retaliation.  French vessels—­though France was at war with Britain—­were actually allowed by the United States, a neutral power, full freedom of its harbours.  The ships of Britain, a power at peace with the United States of America, were refused the same privilege.

For a proper understanding of the position we must unroll a page of history.  Napoleon, though he crushed the Prussians at Jena, could not efface the memory of his own humiliation at Trafalgar.  His ears tingled.  He was waiting to deliver a blow that would equalize the destruction of his fleet by Nelson.  Though Britain remained mistress of the seas, surely, thought the “little corporal,” a way could be found to humble her.  If her sources of food supply, for instance, could be cut off, “the wings of her war-ships would be clipped.”

To this end Napoleon issued an arrogant proclamation, which was of far-reaching effect.  It authorized the destruction of all British goods and all colonial produce shipped to any European port by a British vessel.  It allowed the seizure by France of all ships, of whatever nation, which had even called at a British port.  To this the United States raised no objection, though it was in violation of the world’s law in respect to nations which were at peace with each other.  The United States’ President evidently believed that British resentment at Napoleon’s decree would sooner or later provide the United States with an excuse for a disagreement with Britain.  He was not mistaken.  Britain at once announced that she in her turn would prohibit the ships of other nations visiting French ports until they had first called at a British port.  But two wrongs do not make a right.  England also, being short of seamen by desertion, insisted that she had the right to search for British seamen on American vessels.