Lord Hervey left in the possession of his family a manuscript work, consisting of memoirs of his own time, written in his own autograph, which was clean and legible. This work, which has furnished many of the anecdotes connected with his court life in the foregoing pages, was long guarded from the eye of any but the Hervey family, owing to an injunction given in his will by Augustus, third Earl of Bristol, Lord Hervey’s son, that it should not see the light until after the death of his Majesty George III. It was not therefore published until 1848, when they were edited by Mr. Croker. They are referred to both by Horace Walpole, who had heard of them, if he had not seen them, and by Lord Hailes, as affording the most intimate portraiture of a court that has ever been presented to the English people. Such a delineation as Lord Hervey has left ought to cause a sentiment of thankfulness in every British heart for not being exposed to such influences, to such examples as he gives, in the present day, when goodness, affection, purity, benevolence, are the household deities of the court of our beloved, inestimable Queen Victoria.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 22: Prince Frederick.]
PHILIP DORMER STANHOPE, FOURTH EARL OF CHESTERFIELD.
The King of Table Wits.—Early
Years.—Hervey’s Description of his
Person.—Resolutions
and Pursuits.—Study of Oratory.—The
Duties of an Ambassador.—King
George II.’s Opinion of his
Chroniclers.—Life
in the Country.—Melusina, Countess of
Walsingham.—George
II. and his Father’s Will.—Dissolving
Views.—Madame
du Bouchet.—The Broad-Bottomed
Administration.—Lord-Lieutenant
of Ireland in Time of
Peril.—Reformation
of the Calendar.—Chesterfield
House.—Exclusiveness.—Recommending
’Johnson’s
Dictionary.’—’Old
Samuel,’ to Chesterfield.—Defensive
Pride.—The
Glass of Fashion.—Lord Scarborough’s
Friendship
for Chesterfield.—The
Death of Chesterfield’s Son.—His
Interest in his
Grandsons.—’I must go and Rehearse
my
Funeral.’—Chesterfield’s
Will.—What is a Friend?—Les
Manieres Nobles.—Letters
to his Son.
The subject of this memoir may be thought by some rather the modeller of wits than the original of that class; the great critic and judge of manners rather than the delight of the dinner-table: but we are told to the contrary by one who loved him not. Lord Hervey says of Lord Chesterfield that he was ’allowed by everybody to have more conversable entertaining table-wit than any man of his time; his propensity to ridicule, in which he indulged himself with infinite humour and no distinction; and his inexhaustible spirits, and no discretion; made him sought and feared—liked and not loved—by most of his acquaintance.’