DEDICATION

         &nb
sp;                         Kingsland,
                                        Shipley, Horsham.
                                             October 14, 1917.

My Dear ORAGE,

I dedicate this little essay to you not only because “The New Age” (which is your paper) published it in its original form, but much more because you were, I think, the pioneer, in its modern form at any rate, of the Free Press in this country.  I well remember the days when one used to write to “The New Age” simply because one knew it to be the only paper in which the truth with regard to our corrupt politics, or indeed with regard to any powerful evil, could be told.  That is now some years ago; but even to-day there is only one other paper in London of which this is true, and that is the “New Witness.”  Your paper and that at present edited by Mr. Gilbert Chesterton are the fullest examples of the Free Press we have.

It is significant, I think, that these two papers differ entirely in the philosophies which underlie their conduct and in the social ends at which they aim.  In other words, they differ entirely in religion which is the ultimate spring of all political action.  There is perhaps no single problem of any importance in private or in public morals which the one would not attempt to solve in a fashion different from, and usually antagonistic to, the other.  Yet we discover these two papers with their limited circulation, their lack of advertisement subsidy, their restriction to a comparatively small circle, possessing a power which is not only increasing but has long been quite out of proportion to their numerical status.

Things happen because of words printed in “The New Age” and the “New Witness.”  That is less and less true of what I have called the official press.  The phenomenon is worth analysing.  Its intellectual interest alone will arrest the attention of any future historian.  Here is a force numerically quite small, lacking the one great obvious power of our time (which is the power to bribe), rigidly boycotted—­so much so that it is hardly known outside the circle of its immediate adherents and quite unknown abroad.  Yet this force is doing work—­is creating—­at a moment when almost everything else is marking time; and the work it is doing grows more and more apparent.

The reason is, of course, the principle which was a commonplace with antiquity, though it was almost forgotten in the last modern generation, that truth has a power of its own.  Mere indignation against organized falsehood, mere revolt against it, is creative.

It is the thesis of this little essay, as you will see, that the Free Press will succeed in its main object which is the making of the truth known.

There was a moment, I confess, when I would not have written so hopefully.

Some years ago, especially after I had founded the “Eye-Witness,” I was, in the tedium of the effort, half convinced that success could not be obtained.  It is a mood which accompanies exile.  To produce that mood is the very object of the boycott to which the Free Press is subjected.