INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the pages which follow is, as I have said in the Prefatory Note, to explain the policy pursued toward Germany by Great Britain through the eight years which immediately preceded the great war of 1914.  It was a policy which had two branches, as inseparable as they were distinct.  The preservation of peace, by removing difficulties and getting rid of misinterpretations, was the object of the first branch.  The second branch was concerned with what might happen if we failed in our effort to avert war.  Against any outbreak by which such failure might be followed we had to insure.  The form of the insurance had to be one which, in our circumstances, was practicable, and care had to be taken that it was not of a character that would frustrate the main purpose by provoking, and possibly accelerating, the very calamity against which it was designed to provide.

The situation was delicate and difficult.  The public most properly expected of British Ministers that they should spare no effort for peace and for security.  It was too sensible to ask for every detail of the steps taken for the attainment of this end.  There are matters on which it is mischievous to encourage discussion, even in Parliament.  Members of Parliament know this well, and are sensible about it.  The wisest among them do not press for open statements which if made to the world would imperil the very object which Parliament and the public have directed those responsible to them to seek to attain.  What is objected to in secret diplomacy hardly includes that which from its very nature must be negotiated in the first instance between individuals.

The policy actually followed was in principle satisfactory to the great majority of our people.  To them it was familiar in its general outlines.  But for the minority, which included both our pacifists and our chauvinists, it was either too much or too little.  For, on the one hand, its foundation was the theory that, amid the circumstances of Europe in which it had to be built up, human nature could not be safely relied on unswervingly to resist warlike impulses.  On the other hand, this peril notwithstanding, it was the considered view of those responsible that war neither ought to be regarded as being inevitable, nor was so in fact.  It was quite true that the development of military preparations had been so great as to make Europe resemble an armed camp; but, if actual conflict could be averted, the burden this state of things implied ought finally to render its continuance no longer tolerable.  What was really required was that unbroken peace should be preserved, and the hand of time left to operate.