Upon which Pro-Boers exclaim:  The Government of Pretoria has made every possible concession!

6.—­The Conditions, and Withdrawal of Proposals.

They prove by that exclamation that they had not read Sir Alfred
Milner’s despatches of the 22nd and 23rd of August.

The Government of Pretoria made these concessions, indeed but on condition:  (1) That the British Government shall withdraw its proposal for a joint Commission to enquire into whether the law was workable; (2) That the British Government shall renounce suzerainty; (3) That arbitration—­apart from Foreign Powers, with exception of the Orange Free State—­shall be granted immediately upon the Franchise Law being settled.  On August 28th Mr. Chamberlain replies.  Concerning the suzerainty, he refers to his despatch of July 13th; he consents to discuss the Constitution of a Tribunal of Arbitration from which Foreign Powers, and foreign influence, shall be excluded; he concludes by proposing a fresh Conference.

What is the reply of the Boer Government on September 2nd?  The withdrawal of its proposals of August 19th and 21st, relative to the five years’ Franchise and increase of number of seats in the Volksraad.

Thus, at the end of three months’ negotiations, no conclusion had been arrived at.

It is to this despatch of September 2nd, that Mr. Chamberlain’s despatch of September 8th, replies; in that despatch he states, that he is still prepared to accept the proposals of August 19th concerning the Franchise, provided that the enquiry by a Commission, joint or unilateral, prove that the law is workable.

The representation of Uitlanders in the Volksraad, is, of course, only possible on condition that they had the right to make use of the English language.

On September 23rd, the Transvaal Government replies that the taal, a language not spoken by any but Boers, is to remain the only language used in the Volksraad, and in dilatory phraseology paves the way for the ultimatum of October 9th.  Here we have a summary of the negotiations relating to the franchise, from the time of the Bloemfontein Conference.

7.—­The Franchise is Self-Government.

Confronted with these facts, the Pro-Boer cries:  “Ah, but Mr. Krueger was obliged to protect himself.  He could not have his burghers swamped by Uitlanders.  He was perfectly right.”

Good.  There is the theory that honest dealing is unnecessary in public negotiations; an apology for that system which is in direct contradiction to the maxim of private law that you cannot give and withhold at one and the same time.

“But why should the English insist upon obtaining the franchise for Uitlanders?”

In order that there should be no more need for the British Government to concern itself in Transvaal affairs, Sir Alfred Milner was right when he said to the State Attorney (despatch of August 15th):