Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

Reply Obj. 1:  All these precepts of the law of nature have the character of one natural law, inasmuch as they flow from one first precept.

Reply Obj. 2:  All the inclinations of any parts whatsoever of human nature, e.g. of the concupiscible and irascible parts, in so far as they are ruled by reason, belong to the natural law, and are reduced to one first precept, as stated above:  so that the precepts of the natural law are many in themselves, but are based on one common foundation.

Reply Obj. 3:  Although reason is one in itself, yet it directs all things regarding man; so that whatever can be ruled by reason, is contained under the law of reason. ________________________

THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 94, Art. 3]

Whether All Acts of Virtue Are Prescribed by the Natural Law?

Objection 1:  It would seem that not all acts of virtue are prescribed by the natural law.  Because, as stated above (Q. 90, A. 2) it is essential to a law that it be ordained to the common good.  But some acts of virtue are ordained to the private good of the individual, as is evident especially in regards to acts of temperance.  Therefore not all acts of virtue are the subject of natural law.

Obj. 2:  Further, every sin is opposed to some virtuous act.  If therefore all acts of virtue are prescribed by the natural law, it seems to follow that all sins are against nature:  whereas this applies to certain special sins.

Obj. 3:  Further, those things which are according to nature are common to all.  But acts of virtue are not common to all:  since a thing is virtuous in one, and vicious in another.  Therefore not all acts of virtue are prescribed by the natural law.

On the contrary, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iii, 4) that “virtues are natural.”  Therefore virtuous acts also are a subject of the natural law.

I answer that, We may speak of virtuous acts in two ways:  first, under the aspect of virtuous; secondly, as such and such acts considered in their proper species.  If then we speak of acts of virtue, considered as virtuous, thus all virtuous acts belong to the natural law.  For it has been stated (A. 2) that to the natural law belongs everything to which a man is inclined according to his nature.  Now each thing is inclined naturally to an operation that is suitable to it according to its form:  thus fire is inclined to give heat.  Wherefore, since the rational soul is the proper form of man, there is in every man a natural inclination to act according to reason:  and this is to act according to virtue.  Consequently, considered thus, all acts of virtue are prescribed by the natural law:  since each one’s reason naturally dictates to him to act virtuously.  But if we speak of virtuous acts, considered in themselves, i.e. in their proper species, thus not all virtuous acts are prescribed by the natural law:  for many things are done virtuously, to which nature does not incline at first; but which, through the inquiry of reason, have been found by men to be conducive to well-living.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.