Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

Reply Obj. 3:  Because the apprehensive powers inwardly prepare their proper objects for the possible intellect, therefore it is by the good disposition of these powers, to which the good disposition of the body cooperates, that man is rendered apt to understand.  And so in a secondary way the intellective habit can be in these powers.  But principally it is in the “possible” intellect. ________________________

FIFTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 50, Art. 5]

Whether Any Habit Is in the Will?

Objection 1:  It would seem that there is not a habit in the will.  For the habit which is in the intellect is the intelligible species, by means of which the intellect actually understands.  But the will does not act by means of species.  Therefore the will is not the subject of habit.

Obj. 2:  Further, no habit is allotted to the active intellect, as there is to the “possible” intellect, because the former is an active power.  But the will is above all an active power, because it moves all the powers to their acts, as stated above (Q. 9, A. 1).  Therefore there is no habit in the will.

Obj. 3:  Further, in the natural powers there is no habit, because, by reason of their nature, they are determinate to one thing.  But the will, by reason of its nature, is ordained to tend to the good which reason directs.  Therefore there is no habit in the will.

On the contrary, Justice is a habit.  But justice is in the will; for it is “a habit whereby men will and do that which is just” (Ethic. v, 1).  Therefore the will is the subject of a habit.

I answer that, Every power which may be variously directed to act, needs a habit whereby it is well disposed to its act.  Now since the will is a rational power, it may be variously directed to act.  And therefore in the will we must admit the presence of a habit whereby it is well disposed to its act.  Moreover, from the very nature of habit, it is clear that it is principally related to the will; inasmuch as habit “is that which one uses when one wills,” as stated above (A. 1).

Reply Obj. 1:  Even as in the intellect there is a species which is the likeness of the object; so in the will, and in every appetitive power there must be something by which the power is inclined to its object; for the act of the appetitive power is nothing but a certain inclination, as we have said above (Q. 6, A. 4; Q. 22, A. 2).  And therefore in respect of those things to which it is inclined sufficiently by the nature of the power itself, the power needs no quality to incline it.  But since it is necessary, for the end of human life, that the appetitive power be inclined to something fixed, to which it is not inclined by the nature of the power, which has a relation to many and various things, therefore it is necessary that, in the will and in the other appetitive powers, there be certain qualities to incline them, and these are called habits.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.