strenuous labour of a great brain illumined by the steady flame of love for his country and for his lady.  Mr. Courthope has said that he lacked loftiness and resolution of artistic purpose; without these, we ask, how could a man, not lavishly dowered with poetry in his soul, have achieved so much of it?  It was his very fixity and loftiness of purpose, his English stubbornness and doggedness of resolution that enabled him to surmount so many obstacles of style and metre, of subject and thought.  His two purposes, of glorifying his mistress and his friends, and of sounding England’s glories past and future, while insisting on the dangers of a present decadence, never flagged or failed.  All his poetry up to 1627 has this object directly or secondarily; and much after this date.  Of the more abstract and universal aspects of his art he had not much conception; but he caught eagerly at the fashionable belief in the eternizing power of poetry; and had it not been that, where his patriotism was uppermost, he was deficient in humour and sense of proportion, he would have succeeded better:  as it is, his more directly patriotic pieces are usually the dullest or longest of his works.  He requires, like all other poets, the impulse of an absolutely personal and individual feeling, a moment of more intimate sympathy, to rouse him to his heights of song.  Thus the Ballad of Agincourt is on the very theme of all patriotic themes that most attracted him; Virginian and other Voyages lay very close to his heart; and in certain sonnets to his lady lies his only imperishable work.  Of sheer melody and power of song he had little, apart from his themes:  he could not have sat down and written a few lark’s or nightingale’s notes about nothing as some of his contemporaries were able to do:  he required the stimulus of a subject, and if he were really moved thereby he beat the music out.  Only in one or two of the later Odes, and in the volumes of 1627 and 1630, does his music ever seem to flow from him naturally.  Akin to this quality of broad and extensive workmanship, to this faculty of taking a subject and when writing, with all thought concentrated on it, rather than on the method of writing about it, is his strange lack of what are usually called ‘quotations’.  For this is not only due to the fact that he is little known; there are, besides, so few detached remarks or aphorisms that are separately quotable; so few examples of that curiosa felicitas of diction:  lines like these,

    Thy Bowe, halfe broke, is peec’d with old desire;
    Her Bowe is beauty with ten thousand strings....