of her husband in reference to her general conduct,
he could not be made to say that he had ever noticed
any thing in her of the nature of witchcraft.
The torments the girls affected to experience in looking
at her must have produced an overwhelming effect on
the crowd, as they did on the magistrate, and even
on the poor, amazed creature herself. She did
not seem to doubt the reality of their sufferings.
In this, and in all cases, it must be remembered that
the account of the examination comes to us from those
who were under the wildest excitement against the prisoners;
that no counsel was allowed them; that, if any thing
was suffered to be said in their defence by others,
it has failed to reach us; that the accused persons
were wholly unaccustomed to such scenes and exposures,
unsuspicious of the perils of a cross-examination,
or of an inquisition conducted with a design to entrap
and ensnare; and that what they did say was liable
to be misunderstood, as well as misrepresented.
We cannot hear their story. All we know is from
parties prejudiced, to the highest degree, against
them. Sarah Good was an unfortunate and miserable
woman in her circumstances and condition: but,
from all that appears on the record, making due allowance
for the credulity, extravagance, prejudice, folly,
or malignity of the witnesses; giving full effect
to every thing that can claim the character of substantial
force alleged against her, it is undeniable, that
there was not, beyond the afflicted girls, a particle
of evidence to sustain the charge on which she was
arraigned; and that, in the worst aspect of her case,
she was an object for compassion, rather than punishment.
Altogether, the proceedings against her, which terminated
with her execution, were cruel and shameful to the
highest degree.
On the conclusion of her examination, she was removed
from the meeting-house, and Sarah Osburn brought in.
Her selection, as one of the persons to be first cried
out upon, was judicious. The public mind was
prepared to believe the charge against her. Her
original name was Sarah Warren. She was married,
April 5, 1662, to Robert Prince, who belonged to a
leading family, and owned a valuable farm. He
died early, leaving her with two young children, James
and Joseph.
In the early colonial period, it was the custom for
persons who desired to come from the old country to
America, but had not the means to defray the expenses
of the passage, to let or sell themselves, for a greater
or less length of time, to individuals residing here
who needed their service. The practice continued
down to the present century. Emigrants who thus
sold themselves for a period of years were called
“redemptioners.” Alexander Osburn
came over from Ireland in this character. The
widow of Robert Prince bought out the residue of his
time from the person to whom he was thus under contract,
for fifteen pounds, and employed him to carry on her
farm. After a while, she married him. This,