It appears from his statement that a committee, consisting of “Captain John Putnam, Mr. Joshua Rea, Sr., and Francis Nurse,” was appointed, on the 15th of November, 1688, to treat with him “about taking ministerial office.”  On the 25th of November, “after the services in the afternoon, the audience was stayed, and, by a general vote, requested Mr. Parris to take office.”  He hung back for a while, and exercised the skill and adroitness acquired in his mercantile life in making as sharp a bargain as he could.

At that time, there appeared to be a degree of harmony among the people, such as they had never known before.  There was a disposition on all sides to come together, and avail themselves of the occasion of settling a new minister, to bury their past animosities, and forget their grievances; and there is every reason to believe, if Mr. Parris had promptly closed with their terms, he might have enjoyed a peaceful ministry, and a happy oblivion have covered for ever his name and the history of the village.  But he withheld response to the call.  The people were impatient, and felt that the golden opportunity might be lost, and the old feuds revive.  On the 10th of December, another committee was raised, consisting of Lieutenant Nathaniel Putnam, Sergeant Fuller, Mr. Joshua Rea, Sr., and Sergeant Ingersoll, as “messengers, to know whether Mr. Parris would accept of office.”  His answer was, “the work was weighty; they should know in due time.”  They were thus kept in suspense during the whole winter, getting no reply from him.  On the 29th of April, 1689, “Deacons Nathaniel Ingersoll and Edward Putnam, Daniel Rea, Thomas Fuller, Jr., and John Tarbell, came to Mr. Parris from the meeting-house,” where there had been a general meeting of the inhabitants, and said, “Being the aged men had had the matter of Mr. Parris’s settlement so long in hand, and effected nothing, they were desirous to try what the younger could do.”  Deacon Ingersoll was about fifty-five years of age; but his spirit and character kept him in sympathy with the progressive impulses of younger men.  Deacon Putnam was thirty-four years of age.  Daniel Rea was the son of Joshua; Thomas Fuller, Jr., the son of Sergeant Fuller; and John Tarbell, the son-in-law of Francis Nurse.

This is the first appearance, I believe, in our history, of that notorious and most pretentious personage who has figured so largely in all our affairs ever since, “Young America.”  The sequel shows, that, in this instance at least, no benefit arose from discarding the caution and experience of years.  The “younger men” were determined to “go ahead.”  They said they were desirous of a speedy answer.  Finding them in a temper to “finish the thing up,” at any rate, and seeing that they were ambitious to get the credit of “effecting something,” and, for that end, predisposed to come to his terms, he disclosed them.  They had offered him a salary of sixty pounds per annum,—­one third in money, the rest