images to which they have given rise. Drawings
of animals and some other objects are found among
the lowest savages, such as the Tasmanians and Australians.
Nor is this fact peculiar to the lower historic races,
and to those which are still in existence, but it
is also to be found in the dwellings and remains of
prehistoric man; carvings on stone of very ancient
date have been found, coeval with extinct and fossil
animals, prior to the age of our flora and fauna and
to the present conformation of land and water.
There are many clear proofs of the extreme antiquity
of the primitive impulse to imitative arts. A
stag’s meta-tarsal bone, on which there was
a carving of two ruminants, was found in the cave of
Savigny: in a cave at Eyzies there was a fragmentary
carving of two animals on two slabs of schist; at
La Madelaine there were found two so-called staves
of office, on which were representations of a horse,
of reindeer, cattle, and other animals; two outlines
of men, one of a fore-arm, and one of a naked man
in a stooping position, with a short staff on his shoulder;
there is also the outline of a mammoth on a sheet
of ivory; a statuette of a thin woman without arms,
found by M. Vibraye at Laugerie-Basse, and known by
the name of the immodest Venus; a drawing representing
a man, or so-called hunter, armed with a bow, and
pursuing a male auroch, going with its head down and
of a fierce aspect; the man is perfectly naked, and
wears a pointed beard. Other designs of the chase
and of animals afford a clear proof of the remote
period at which the primitive instinct towards the
imitative arts existed.
It is peculiar to man to portray things and animals,
and to erect monuments out of a superstitious feeling,
or to glorify an individual or the nation; the bower-birds
and some cognate species may perhaps be regarded as
an exception, since they show a certain sense of beauty,
and an extrinsic satisfaction in gay colours, which
indeed appears in many animals. But art in the
true sense and in its essential principle are the
act and product of man alone, of which I have demonstrated
the cause and comparative reasons in another work,
so that it is unnecessary to repeat them here.
Some rare cases indicate an artistic construction
which is not an essential part of animal functions,
and the sense of form and colour occurs in some species.
But this only shows that there exist in the animal
kingdom the roots of every art and sentiment peculiar
to man, subsequently perfected by him in an exclusive
and reflex manner, and this confirms the general truths
of heredity and evolution.
When primitive man draws or carves objects, he does
not merely obey the innate impulse to give an external
form to the image already in his mind, but while satisfying
the aesthetic sentiment which actuates him, he is
conscious of some mysterious power and superstitious
influence. This sentiment is not only apparent
in our own children, but among nearly all savages,
of which many instances might be given; some of them
are even afraid to look at a portrait, and shrink
from it as from a living person.