No sooner was the book issued than another problem arose.  Who was to carry out all these drastic alterations?  Once again, recourse was had to the half-pay Colonel in Kent!  Who so fit to materialise reforms as the man who had conceived them?  So in 1895 Colonel French was ensconced in the War Office as Assistant Adjutant-General of Cavalry.  There were great reforms instituted.

British cavalry was placed on a brigade establishment at home stations.  Which means that, for the first time, three regiments were grouped into a brigade and placed under the command of a staff colonel, who was entirely responsible for their training.  In the summer months the regiments were massed for combined training.

In spite of the revolution he was accomplishing, it is doubtful whether French was at all happy at the War Office.  He is essentially a man of action.  Unlike Kitchener, he prefers execution to organisation, and he probably chafed horribly over the interminable disentangling of knots which is efficient organisation.  His one consolation was the solution every night before he left his desk of a refreshing problem in tactics.

[Page Heading:  FROM STOOL TO SADDLE]

There are endless stories of his pacing up and down that back room in Pall Mall like a caged lion.  Like Mr. Galsworthy’s Ferrand he hates to do “round business on an office stool.”  His temperament is entirely dynamic.  Everything static and stay-at-home is utter boredom to him.  Probably no soldier ever showed the qualities and the limitations of the man of action in more vivid contrast.

His trials, however, were not of long duration.  So soon as the brigade system had been fully organised he was given command of one of the units which he had created—­the Second Cavalry Brigade at Canterbury.  Here he was able to achieve one of his most notable successes.  It happened during the 1898 manoeuvres.  As commander of a brigade, French was chosen to lead Buller’s force in the mimic campaign.  His opponent was General Talbot, an older officer who worked on the stereo-typed methods.  The antiquity of his antagonist’s ideas gave French his opportunity.  He made such a feature of reconnaissance that the experts declared his tactics to be hopelessly rash.  But by the mobility of his force he continually checked and out-manoeuvred his opponent—­appearing in the most unexpected places in the most unaccountable ways.

[Page Heading:  THE CRITICS ROUTED]

At the end of the manoeuvres the fighting centred round Yarmbury Castle.  All day French had been harassing General Talbot’s forces.  At last, by a rapid movement, his cavalry surprised several batteries of the enemy’s horse artillery.  He commanded them to dismount and made the whole force his prisoners.  When the umpires upheld his claim, the experts aforesaid were given considerable food for thought.

The general conclusion was that luck had contributed to his success, and that in actual warfare such recklessness might lead to disaster.  Consequently, French’s opponents were justified to some extent in their insistence that the old methods were best.  Indeed, his success only strengthened prejudice in certain quarters.