Georgia.—­The extreme southeastern limit of the buffalo in the United States was found on the coast of Georgia, near the mouth of the Altamaha River, opposite St. Simon’s Island.  Mr. Francis Moore, in his “Voyage to Georgia,” made in 1736 and reported upon in 1744,[9] makes the following observation: 

[Note 9:  Coll.  Georgia Hist.  Soc., I, p. 117.]

“The island [St. Simon’s] abounds with deer and rabbits.  There are no buffalo in it, though there are large herds upon the main.”  Elsewhere in the same document (p. 122) reference is made to buffalo-hunting by Indians on the main-land near Darien.

In James E. Oglethorpe’s enumeration (A.  D. 1733) of the wild beasts of Georgia and South Carolina he mentions “deer, elks, bears, wolves, and buffaloes."[10]

[Note 10:  Ibid., I, p. 51.]

Up to the time of Moore’s voyage to Georgia the interior was almost wholly unexplored, and it is almost certain that had not the “large herds of buffalo on the main-land” existed within a distance of 20 or 30 miles or less from the coast, the colonists would have had no knowledge of them; nor would the Indians have taken to the war-path against the whites at Darien “under pretense of hunting buffalo.”

Alabama.—­Having established the existence of the bison in northwestern Georgia almost as far down as the center of the State, and in Mississippi down to the neighborhood of the coast, it was naturally expected that a search of historical records would reveal evidence that the bison once inhabited the northern half of Alabama.  A most careful search through all the records bearing upon the early history and exploration of Alabama, to be found in the Library of Congress, failed to discover the slightest reference to the existence of the species in that State, or even to the use of buffalo skins by any of the Alabama Indians.  While it is possible that such a hiatus really existed, in this instance its existence would be wholly unaccountable.  I believe that the buffalo once inhabited the northern half of Alabama, even though history fails to record it.

Louisiana and Mississippi.—­At the beginning of the eighteenth century, buffaloes were plentiful in southern Mississippi and Louisiana, not only down to the coast itself, from Bay St. Louis to Biloxi, but even in the very Delta of the Mississippi, as the following record shows.  In a “Memoir addressed to Count de Pontchartrain,” December 10, 1697, the author, M. de Remonville, describes the country around the mouth of the Mississippi, now the State of Louisiana, and further says:[11]

“A great abundance of wild cattle are also found there, which might be domesticated by rearing up the young calves.”  Whether these animals were buffaloes might be considered an open question but for the following additional information, which affords positive evidence:  “The trade in furs and peltry would be immensely valuable and exceedingly profitable.  We could also draw from thence a great quantity of buffalo hides every year, as the plains are filled with the animals.”