of lime in solution as bicarbonate, is decomposed and
carbonate of lime precipitated. You can at once
imagine, then, what takes place in your steam boilers
when such water is used, and how incrustations are
formed. Let us now inquire as to the precise nature
of the waste and injury caused by hard and impure
waters. Let us also take, as an example, those
most commonly occurring injurious constituents, the
magnesian and calcareous impurities. Hard water
only produces a lather with soap when that soap has
effected the softening of the water, and not till
then. In that process the soap is entirely wasted,
and the fatty acids in it form, with the lime and
magnesia, insoluble compounds called lime and magnesia
soaps, which are sticky, greasy, adhesive bodies,
that precipitate and fix some colouring matters like
a mordant. We have in such cases, then, a kind
of double mischief—(i) waste of soap, (ii)
injury to colours and dyes on the fabrics. But
this is not all, for colours are precipitated as lakes,
and mordants also are precipitated, and thus wasted,
in much the same sense as the soaps are. Now
by taking a soap solution, formed by dissolving a known
weight of soap in a known volume of water, and adding
this gradually to hard water until a permanent lather
is just produced, we can directly determine the consumption
of soap by such a water, and ascertain the hardness.
Such a method is called Clark’s process of determination
or testing, or Clark’s soap test. We hear
a great deal just now of soaps that will wash well
in hard water, and do wonders under any conditions;
but mark this fact, none of them will begin to perform
effective duty until such hard water has been rendered
soft at the expense of the soap. Soaps made of
some oils, such as cocoa-nut oil, for example, are
more soluble in water than when made of tallow, etc.,
and so they more quickly soften a hard water and yield
lather, but they are wasted, as far as consumption
is concerned, to just the same extent as any other
soaps. They do not, however, waste so much time
and trouble in effecting the end in view, and, as
you know, “Time is money” in these days
of work and competition. After making a soap
test as described above, and knowing the quantity of
water used, it is, of course, easy to calculate the
annual loss of soap caused by the hardness of the
water. The monthly consumption of soap in London
is 1,000,000 kilograms (about 1000 tons), and it is
estimated that the hardness of the Thames water means
the use of 230,000 kilograms (nearly 230 tons) more
soap per month than would be necessary if soft water
were used. Of course the soap manufacturers around
London would not state that fact on their advertising
placards, but rather dwell on the victorious onslaught
their particular brand will make on the dirt in articles
to be washed, in the teeth of circumstances that would
be hopeless for any other brand of soap! I have
referred to the sticky and adhesive character of the