[85] House Doc., 16 Cong. 1 sess.
III. No. 42, pp. 10-11.
Cf. Report
of the House Committee, Jan. 10, 1818: “It
is but
too notorious
that numerous infractions of the law prohibiting
the importation
of slaves into the United States have been
perpetrated with
impunity upon our southern frontier.” Amer.
State Papers,
Miscellaneous, II. No. 441.
[86] Special message of Jan. 13, 1818:
House Journal, 15
Cong. 1 sess.
pp. 137-9.
[87] Collector McIntosh, of the District of
Brunswick, Ga., to
the Secretary
of the Treasury. House Doc., 16 Cong. 1 sess.
III. No.
42, pp. 8-9.
[88] House Doc., 16 Cong. 1 sess. III. No. 42, pp. 6-7.
[89] Ibid., pp. 11-12.
[90] Amer. State Papers, Miscellaneous, II. No. 529.
[91] House Doc., 16 Cong. 1 sess. III. No. 42, p. 7.
[92] Ibid., p. 6.
[93] House Reports, 21 Cong. 1 sess. III. No. 348, p. 82.
[94] They were not general instructions, but
were directed to
Commander Campbell.
Cf. House Doc., 15 Cong. 2 sess. IV.
No.
84, pp. 5-6.
[95] Statutes at Large, III. 471 ff.
[96] House Doc., 15 Cong. 2 sess. VI. No. 107, pp. 8-9.
[97] Ibid., IV. No. 84. Cf.
Chew’s letters in House
Reports, 21
Cong. 1 sess. III. No. 348.
[98] House Doc., 15 Cong. 1 sess.
II. No. 12, pp. 22, 38; 15
Cong. 2 sess.
VI. No. 100, p. 13; 16 Cong. 1 sess. III.
No.
42, p. 9, etc.;
House Reports, 21 Cong. 1 sess. III.
No.
348, p. 85.
[99] House Doc., 15 Cong. 2 sess. VI. No. 107, pp. 8-9.
[100] House Reports, 21 Cong. 1 sess. III. No. 348, p. 77.
[101] Cf. House Doc., 16 Cong. 1 sess.
III. No. 42, p. 11:
“The Grand
Jury found true bills against the owners of the
vessels, masters,
and a supercargo—all of whom are
discharged; why
or wherefore I cannot say, except that it
could not be for
want of proof against them.”
[102] E.g., in July, 1818, one informer “will
have to leave
that part of the
country to save his life”: Ibid.,
15 Cong.
2 sess. VI.
No. 100, p. 9.
[103] Joseph Nourse, Register of the Treasury, to
Hon. W.H.
Crawford, Secretary
of the Treasury: Ibid., 15 Cong. 2 sess.
VI. No. 107,
p. 5.
[104] The slaves on the “Constitution”
were not condemned, for
the technical
reason that she was not captured by a
commissioned officer
of the United States navy.
[105] These proceedings are very obscure, and little
was said
about them.
The Spanish claimants were, it was alleged with
much probability,
but representatives of Americans. The claim
was paid under
the provisions of the Treaty of Florida, and
included slaves
whom the court afterward declared forfeited.