answer to Dr. Belknap’s inquiry, Feb. 23, 1795, in Deane
(Mass. Hist. Soc. Coll., 5th Ser., III. 385). A committee on
slave importation was appointed in 1764. Cf. House Journal,
1763-64, p. 170.
[22] House Journal, 1771, pp. 211, 215,
219, 228, 234, 236,
240, 242-3; Moore,
Slavery in Massachusetts, pp. 131-2.
[23] Felt, Annals of Salem (1849), II.
416-7; Swan,
Dissuasion
to Great Britain, etc. (1773), p. x; Washburn,
Historical
Sketches of Leicester, Mass., pp. 442-3; Freeman,
History of
Cape Cod, II. 114; Deane, in Mass. Hist.
Soc.
Coll., 5th
Ser., III. 432; Moore, Slavery in Massachusetts,
pp. 135-40; Williams,
History of the Negro Race in America,
I. 234-6; House
Journal, March, 1774, pp. 224, 226, 237,
etc.; June,
1774, pp. 27, 41, etc. For a copy of the
bill, see
Moore.
[24] Mass. Hist. Soc. Proceedings,
1855-58, p. 196; Force,
American Archives,
5th Ser., II. 769; House Journal, 1776,
pp. 105-9; General
Court Records, March 13, 1776, etc., pp.
581-9; Moore,
Slavery in Massachusetts, pp. 149-54. Cf.
Moore, pp. 163-76.
[25] Moore, Slavery in Massachusetts, pp. 148-9, 181-5.
[26] Washburn, Extinction of Slavery in Massachusetts;
Haynes, Struggle
for the Constitution in Massachusetts; La
Rochefoucauld,
Travels through the United States, II. 166.
[27] Moore, Slavery in Massachusetts, p. 225.
[28] Perpetual Laws of Massachusetts,
1780-89, p. 235. The
number of slaves in Massachusetts has been estimated
as
follows:—
In 1676, 200. Randolph’s
Report, in Hutchinson’s Coll.
of Papers, p. 485.
" 1680, 120. Deane, Connection
of Mass. with Slavery,
p. 28 ff.
" 1708, 550. Ibid.; Moore, Slavery
in Mass., p. 50.
" 1720, 2,000. Ibid.
" 1735, 2,600. Deane, Connection
of Mass. with Slavery,
p. 28 ff.
" 1749, 3,000. Ibid.
" 1754, 4,489. Ibid.
" 1763, 5,000. Ibid.
" 1764-5, 5,779. Ibid.
" 1776, 5,249. Ibid.
" 1784, 4,377. Moore, Slavery in
Mass., p. 51.
" 1786, 4,371. Ibid.
" 1790, 6,001. Ibid.
[29] R.I. Col. Rec., I. 240.
[30] Cf. letter written in 1681: New
England Register, XXXI.
75-6. Cf.
also Arnold, History of Rhode Island, I. 240.
[31] The text of this act is lost (Col.
Rec., IV. 34;
Arnold, History
of Rhode Island, II. 31). The Acts of Rhode
Island were not
well preserved, the first being published in
Boston in 1719.
Perhaps other whole acts are lost.