1. Resolved, That slavery is right, and that being right,
    there can be no wrong in the natural means to its formation.

    2. Resolved, That it is expedient and proper that the foreign
    slave trade should be re-opened, and that this Convention will
    lend its influence to any legitimate measure to that end.

3. Resolved, That a committee, consisting of one from each slave State, be appointed to consider of the means, consistent with the duty and obligations of these States, for re-opening the foreign slave-trade, and that they report their plan to the next meeting of this Convention.

Yancey, from the same committee, presented a minority report, which, though it demanded the repeal of the national prohibitory laws, did not advocate the reopening of the trade by the States.

Much debate ensued.  Pryor of Virginia declared the majority report “a proposition to dissolve the Union.”  Yancey declared that “he was for disunion now. [Applause.]” He defended the principle of the slave-trade, and said:  “If it is right to buy slaves in Virginia and carry them to New Orleans, why is it not right to buy them in Cuba, Brazil, or Africa, and carry them there?” The opposing speeches made little attempt to meet this uncomfortable logic; but, nevertheless, opposition enough was developed to lay the report on the table until the next convention, with orders that it be printed, in the mean time, as a radical campaign document.  Finally the convention passed a resolution:—­

    That it is inexpedient for any State, or its citizens, to
    attempt to re-open the African slave-trade while that State is
    one of the United States of America.[8]

83. Commercial Convention of 1859. The Convention of 1859 met at Vicksburg, Mississippi, May 9-19, and the slave-trade party came ready for a fray.  On the second day Spratt called up his resolutions, and the next day the Committee on Resolutions recommended that, "in the opinion of this Convention, all laws, State or Federal, prohibiting the African slave trade, ought to be repealed." Two minority reports accompanied this resolution:  one proposed to postpone action, on account of the futility of the attempt at that time; the other report recommended that, since repeal of the national laws was improbable, nullification by the States impracticable, and action by the Supreme Court unlikely, therefore the States should bring in the Africans as apprentices, a system the legality of which “is incontrovertible.”  “The only difficult question,” it was said, “is the future status of the apprentices after the expiration of their term of servitude."[9] Debate on these propositions began in the afternoon.  A brilliant speech on the resumption of the importation of slaves, says Foote of Mississippi, “was listened to with breathless attention and applauded vociferously.  Those of us who rose in opposition were looked upon