true religion which springs up in the soul of the
individual, and historical tradition. If there
is such a thing as religion, it must exist equally
for all men, for those who accidentally received a
report of a certain historical event, as well as for
those who remained in ignorance of the fact. All
heretical demonstrations were rooted in a vague realisation
of this contrast. But Eckhart accomplished the
unparalleled deed of once more building a bridge between
the soul and the deity; of relegating to the background
all the ineradicable historical misrepresentations
or, if there was no alternative, of unhesitatingly
proclaiming them as erroneous, or interpreting them
symbolically. “St. Paul’s words,”
he says, for instance, “are nothing but the
words of Paul; it is not true that he spoke them in
a state of grace.” He did not regard the
Scriptures as the bourne of truth, but as subsequent
proof of the directly experienced truth of the divine
event. With this conception Christianity had reached
its highest stage. Henceforth the origin of all
truths and values was no longer sought in doctrine
and authority, but in the soul of man; God was neither
to be found in the heavens nor in history, but in the
soul; the soul must become divine and creative; it
had found its task: the recreation of the world.
It was true, St. Augustine had said: “
Non
Christianised, Christi sumus,” but this saying
had never been understood, and very probably St. Augustine
had not meant it in its literal sense. At last
the fundamental consciousness of Christianity had
triumphed: the principle of the “Son-of-Godship”
inspired the soul of the mystics; in future religion
must emanate from the soul and find its goal in God;
written documents and—in the case of the
profoundest thinkers—examples were no longer
needed. The heretical sects had been content
to reject post-evangelical tradition, in order to lay
greater stress on the words of Christ. They were
genuine reformers, but they were as much constrained
by the historical facts as the Roman Catholic Church,
and their standpoint has to this day remained the standpoint
of the Protestant professions of faith.
The fact of this new conception attaching no importance
to the historical Jesus of Nazareth (had he never
lived it would have made no difference) made of it
a new religion. By putting aside this external
and accidental moment, it placed the metaphysical and
purely spiritual core of Christianity, the fundamental
conviction of the divinity of the soul, and the will
to eternal life, within the centre of religious consciousness,
and by so doing put itself beyond the reach of historical
criticism and scepticism, Eckhart, more than any other
teacher, was profoundly convinced of the freedom and
eternal value of the soul. “I, as the Son,
am the same as my Heavenly Father.” He taught
that Christ is born in the soul, that the divine spark
is continuously re-kindled in the soul: “It
is the quality of eternity that life and youth are