to keep bodily heat down when the outside temperature
is 50 or even 80 degrees above that of the body?
Physiologists have not explained this, although assuredly
an explanation is wanted. But the true explanation,
the correct explanation, would have demolished the
doctrine that bodily heat is due to the food, and
so it has not been given. It is too simple to
imagine that the bodily heat is, like the body itself
and all its functions, the effect of the life-force
that inhabits the body and builds up the body so
that the body shall be a fit dwelling-place for itself—this
explanation is too simple and too idealistic for
modern science, which is less and less disposed, we
are told, to invoke the aid of a force of life to
account for vital phenomena, although it assumes
an attracting force to account for gravitating phenomena,
and an electric and chemic force to account for electric
and chemic phenomena. Modern science (and ancient
science, too, apparently) which sees well enough
that an idealistic or a materialistic explanation
would equally account for the nexus of the phenomena
of the universe, deliberately and almost invariably
prefers the materialistic explanation. She is
anxious that we should be kept free of superstition.
But the superstition that forces are the effects of
things does not seem to distress her at all. And
so we are told that gravitation is a property of
matter, and are forbidden to think that perhaps gravitation,
a force, procreates matter, a thing, in order that
the effects of the fore may be perceived by dull sense.
We are told that the function of the liver and the
brain depends on the structure of the liver and the
brain respectively and we are not allowed to think
that perhaps the force of animal life, feeling the
need of an instrument to secrete bile, on the one
hand, and to secrete cerebral lymph to act as a vehicle
for the conveyance of thought and emotion and higher
things, on the other, introduces the liver with its
elaborate structure and the brain with its still more
complicated structure, in order that both the one
function and the other may be well performed.
And so, although all forms of kinetic energy (and
among them zoo-dynamic, or the force of animal life)
manifest warmth and luminosity as qualities, science
attributes animal heat to chemic force and refuses
to consider that perhaps zoo-dynamic uses chemico-dynamic
for its own purposes, even if these purposes are unconscious,
because the higher force always dominates the lower.
Properly speaking, science is out of her sphere, though
she does not seem to know it, in making these suggestions.
When she keeps herself to the investigation of facts,
their exposition, their sequence and their laws,
in her painstaking and accurate manner, we accept her
revelations thankfully, and beg her to allow us to
make our own philosophic and other explanations in
attempting to account for the existence, sequences
and relations of the facts of life.
After his return home, patient continued