If so be we list to search this matter from the bottom,
we know in the very Apostles’ times there were
Christians, through whom the Name of the Lord was
blasphemed and evil spoken of among the Gentiles.
Constantius the emperor bewaileth, as it is written
in Sozomenus, that many waxed worse after they had
fallen to the religion of Christ. And Cyprian,
in a lamentable oration, setteth out the corrupt manners
in his time: “The wholesome discipline,”
saith he, “which the Apostles left unto us,
hath idleness and long rest now utterly marred:
everyone studied to increase his livelihood; and clean
forgetting either what they had done before whilst
they were under the Apostles, or what they ought continually
to do, having received the faith they earnestly laboured
to make great their own wealth with an unsatiable desire
of covetousness. There is no devout religion,”
saith he, “in priests, no sound faith in ministers,
no charity showed in good works, no form of godliness
in their conditions: men are become effeminate,
and women’s beauty is counterfeited.”
And before his days, said Tertullian, “O how
wretched be we, which are called Christians at this
time! for we live as heathens under the Name of Christ.”
And without reciting of many more writers, Gregory
Nazianzen speaketh thus of the pitiful state of his
own time: “We,” saith he, “are
in hatred among the heathen for our own vices’
sake; we are also become now a wonder, not only to
angels and men, but even to all the ungodly.”
In this case was the Church of God, when the Gospel
first began to shine, and when the fury of tyrants
was not as yet cooled, nor the sword taken off from
the Christians’ necks. Surely it is no
new thing that men be but men, although they be called
by the name of Christians.
PART IV.
But will these men, I pray you, think nothing at all
of themselves, while they accuse us so maliciously?
And while they have leisure to behold so far off,
and see both what is done in Germany and in England,
have they either forgotten, or can they not see what
is done at Rome? or be they our accusers, whose life
is such as no man is able to make mention thereof
but with shame and uncomeliness? Our purpose
here is, not to take in hand, at this present, to
bring to light and open to the world those things
which were meet rather to be hid and buried with the
workers of them. It beseemeth neither our religion,
nor our modesty, nor our shamefastness. But
yet he, which giveth commandment that he should be
called the “Vicar of Christ,” and the “Head
of the Church;” who also heareth that such things
be done in Rome, who seeth them, who suffereth them
(for we will go no further), he can easily consider
with himself what manner of things they be.
Let him on God’s Name call to mind, let him
remember that they be of his own canonists, which have
taught the people that fornication between single
folk is no sin (as though they had fette that doctrine