Supposing God to be the author and the motor of nature, there could be no disorder relating to Him; all causes which He would have made would necessarily act according to their properties the essences and the impulsions that He had endowed them with.  If God should change the ordinary course of things, He would not be immutable.  If the order of the universe—­in which we believe we see the most convincing proof of His existence, of His intelligence, His power, and His goodness—­should be inconsistent, His existence might be doubted; or He might be accused at least of inconstancy, of inability, of want of foresight, and of wisdom in the first arrangement of things; we would have a right to accuse Him of blundering in His choice of agents and instruments.  Finally, if the order of nature proves the power and the intelligence, disorder ought to prove the weakness, inconstancy, and irrationality of Divinity.  You say that God is everywhere; that He fills all space; that nothing was made without Him; that matter could not act without Him as its motor.  But in this case you admit that your God is the author of disorder; that it is He who deranges nature; that He is the Father of confusion; that He is in man; and that He moves man at the moment when he sins.  If God is everywhere, He is in me; He acts with me; He is deceived when I am deceived; He questions with me the existence of God; He offends God with me.  Oh, theologians! you never understand yourselves when you speak of God.

XLVI.—­A PURE SPIRIT CAN NOT BE INTELLIGENT, AND TO ADORE A DIVINE INTELLIGENCE IS A CHIMERA.

To be what we call intelligent, we must have ideas, thoughts, will; to have ideas, thoughts, and will, we must have organs; to have organs, we must have a body; to act upon bodies, we must have a body; to experience trouble, we must be capable of suffering; from which it evidently follows that a pure spirit can not be intelligent, and can not be affected by that which takes place in the universe.

Divine intelligence, divine ideas, divine views, you say, have nothing in common with those of men.  So much the better!  But in this case, how can men judge of these views—­whether good or evil—­reason about these ideas, or admire this intelligence?  It would be to judge, to admire, to adore that of which we can form no idea.  To adore the profound views of divine wisdom, is it not to worship that of which it is impossible for us to judge?  To admire these same views, is it not admiring without knowing wry?  Admiration is always the daughter of ignorance.  Men admire and worship only what they do not understand.

XLVII.—­ALL THE QUALITIES WHICH THEOLOGY GIVES TO ITS GOD ARE CONTRARY TO THE VERY ESSENCE WHICH IT SUPPOSES HIM TO HAVE.