a form of contract was adopted and an invitation issued
by the Board to contractors to bid for the construction
and operation of the railroad. There were two
bidders, one of whom was John B. McDonald, whose terms
submitted under the invitation were accepted on January
15, 1900; and, for the first time, it seemed as if
a beginning might be made in the actual construction
of the rapid transit road. The letter of invitation
to contractors required that every proposal should
be accompanied by a certified check upon a National
or State Bank, payable to the order of the Comptroller,
for $150,000, and that within ten days after acceptance,
or within such further period as might be prescribed
by the Board, the contract should be duly executed
and delivered. The amount to be paid by the city
for the construction was $35,000,000 and an additional
sum not to exceed $2,750,000 for terminals, station
sites, and other purposes. The construction was
to be completed in four years and a half, and the
term of the lease from the city to the contractor
was fixed at fifty years, with a renewal, at the option
of the contractor, for twenty-five years at a rental
to be agreed upon by the city, not less than the average
rental for the then preceding ten years. The
rental for the fifty-year term was fixed at an amount
equal to the annual interest upon the bonds issued
by the city for construction and 1 per cent. additional,
such 1 per cent. during the first ten years to be
contingent in part upon the earnings of the road.
To secure the performance of the contract by Mr. McDonald
the city required him to deposit $1,000,000 in cash
as security for construction, to furnish a bond with
surety for $5,000,000 as security for construction
and equipment, and to furnish another bond of $1,000,000
as continuing security for the performance of the contract.
The city in addition to this security had, under the
provisions of the Rapid Transit Act, a first lien
on the equipment, and it should be mentioned that
at the expiration of the lease and renewals (if any)
the equipment is to be turned over to the city, pending
an agreement or arbitration upon the question of the
price to be paid for it by the city. The contract
(which covered about 200 printed pages) was minute
in detail as to the work to be done, and sweeping powers
of supervision were given the city through the Chief
Engineer of the Board, who by the contract was made
arbiter of all questions that might arise as to the
interpretation of the plans and specifications.
The city had been fortunate in securing for the preparation
of plans the services of Mr. William Barclay Parsons,
one of the foremost engineers of the country.
For years as Chief Engineer of the Board he had studied
and developed the various plans and it was he who was
to superintend on behalf of the city the completion
of the work.